News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Donald Trump lawyers to launch wind farm challenge  

Credit:  by FRANK URQUHART | The Scotsman | 11 November 2013 | www.scotsman.com ~~

Donald Trump’s lawyers will go to the Court of Session tomorrow to launch the tycoon’s legal challenge against the Scottish Government’s decision to approve the controversial offshore wind farm he claims forced him to pull the plug on future investment in his luxury Scottish golf resort.

The hearing for a judicial review over the European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre (EOWDC) in Aberdeen Bay is expected to last four days.

Lawyers acting for Trump have already lodged a petition at the Court of Session, asking the court to declare that the decisions not to hold a public inquiry and the subsequent approval of the EOWDC were unlawful.

The EOWDC is being spearheaded by Swedish company Vattenfall – Europe’s sixth-largest generator of electricity – together with the Aberdeen Renewable Energy Group (AREG), and engineering company Technip Offshore Wind.

The petition, lodged by the Trump legal team, argues that the Trump Organisation was denied a fair hearing as result of Scottish Ministers’ refusal to hold a public inquiry and that their rights under the European Convention on Human Rights were breached as a result.

The Trump organisation also claim that “it appears that the Scottish Government, as well as Aberdeen City Council,” have a financial involvement in the project. Both Aberdeenshire and Aberdeen City Council have a councillor on the board of directors of AREG, a 25 per cent shareholder in the wind farm project.

According to the petition the Trump development “had been found to be of national significance” and the Trump Organisation had a “legitimate expectation” that the wind farm application would be the subject of a public inquiry.

It argues: “The holding of public inquiry would provide a procedural safeguard against the appearance of bias in the decision- taking process. It was even more critical to hold an inquiry given that the respondents (the Government) and the two local authorities appear to have a financial involvement in the project. A public inquiry would have afforded the petitioners, the respondents and others the opportunity to obtain further information on the likely outcome for the Menie Estate.”

Trump has hired Gordon Steele QC, one of Scotland’s top legal planning counsel, to lead his case at the Court of Session.

A spokeswoman for Trump organisation said: “ Senior members of the New York executive team arrived in Edinburgh today and are currently working with our legal representatives in preparation for the judicial review, which begins tomorrow. We welcome the opportunity to present our case before the Court of Session.”

But Lang Banks, the director of environmental pressure group WWF Scotland, said: “It’s depressing to think that Donald Trump has nothing better to do than use his vast wealth to try and undermine Scotland’s aim of becoming a cleaner, greener, job-creating nation. We hope that in the end the court agrees that giving the go-ahead to this development was the right decision.”

He continued: “Scotland is home to a quarter of Europe’s offshore wind resource. Studies estimate that Scotland’s offshore wind industry could create 28,000 jobs by 2020 and contribute over £7 billion of investment to the economy. It would be a great pity if Donald Trump was in any way responsible for frustrating Scotland’s ambition to generate clean power and green jobs.”

Source:  by FRANK URQUHART | The Scotsman | 11 November 2013 | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.