[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Champaign County appeals wind decision; Commissioners, neighbors group both object to state ruling on turbines 

Credit:  By Matt Sanctis, Staff Writer | Springfield News-Sun | Nov. 7, 2013 | www.springfieldnewssun.com ~~

The Champaign County commissioners will appeal a recent state decision to approve the Buckeye Wind Project, saying the county will contest parts of the decision, including setbacks, use of roads and bridges and decommissioning.

Earlier this year, the Ohio Power Siting Board voted to allow the second phase of the Buckeye Wind Project to move forward. Combined with an earlier first phase, the project would build about 100 turbines across Champaign County.

Officials in Urbana, Union, and Goshen Twp., along with the Champaign County commissioners, have decided to appeal parts of the state’s decision, said Kevin Talebi, Champaign County prosecutor. Talebi said the appeal, approved by commissioners this week, is expected to be filed before the end of the month.

Union Neighbors United, a group of area residents opposed to the project, has also previously said it plans to appeal the state’s decision to the Ohio Supreme Court. Talebi said the county and UNU are concerned with different aspects of the project, and the two groups will file separate appeals.

The first phase of the project was also appealed to the state’s highest court, and in that case the Ohio Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in favor of the Ohio Power Siting Board, allowing the project to move forward. In the first phase of the project, Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger wrote the court’s majority opinion, saying the state board acted within the required regulations to approve the project.

Justice Evelyn Lundberg wrote the dissenting opinion, arguing the state board did not go far enough to protect the public in the case.

Developers of the wind project have also recently said they plan to seek a payment in lieu of taxes, or PILOT, for the project from the county commissioners. Under the PILOT program, Everpower Renewables, the company in charge of the project, would pay about $1.8 million annually to the county, or about $40 million over the life of the project. They did not set a specific timeline for when that proposal might be presented to the commissioners.

Source:  By Matt Sanctis, Staff Writer | Springfield News-Sun | Nov. 7, 2013 | www.springfieldnewssun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky