LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

A tough crowd turns out for wind farm meeting in Alexandria 

Credit:  By DAN SEUFERT, Union Leader Correspondent | November 06, 2013 | www.unionleader.com ~~

ALEXANDRIA – Ed Cherien, project manager for Iberdrola Renewables, faced a crowd of about 150 people at Alexandria Town Hall Tuesday night – most opponents of his company’s proposed Wild Meadows wind farm.

“I have been portrayed as a traitor,” the veteran leader of public hearings for the Spain-based wind power giant said. “I’m proud of the company I work for, just as people who work for Freudenberg in Bristol (owned by German and Japanese companies) are proud of the company they work for.”

“I grew up in New Hampshire, I have kids in school here,” he said. “I care about this state.”

Cherien has met with residents in Alexandria and surrounding towns several times in the past year about Wild Meadows wind farm, which would go on ridgelines visible to Newfound Lake and Cardigan Mountain. Tuesday night, he explained that the $150 million project had been reduced in size and scope to meet the concerns of residents.

“I think you’re doing a marvelous job of telling us what’s right for you and your company,” said resident Jan Connor. “You’re just not telling us what’s right for us.”

The initial proposal called for 37, 40-story towers in Alexandria, Danbury and Grafton. The new proposal includes 23 turbines, with a 31 percent reduction in the project’s footprint, Cherien said. The turbines planned for Grafton have been removed from the project proposal, which is still in its design stages, he said.

Before rising to speak, Cherien heard Bristol state Rep. Harold “Skip” Reilly from Bristol and County Commissioner Martha Richards speak against the project, both saying New Hampshire would not benefit from the electricity produced from Wild Meadows.

“There’s no benefit to the properties, there’s no benefit to tourism,” Richards said, citing a study done by a Vermont professor claiming the Granite State would benefit little in terms of electricity from the project or any new wind farm projects.

“The windmill power will be just going out into the grid somewhere,” she said.

Cherien said the project would generate lots of local jobs and benefit area towns substantially – Alexandria would be getting about $400,000 each year from the project. He disputed claims that the project would not help the state.

“There’s no such thing as a New Hampshire power pool. What happens to one New England state happens to all of us; the states are all interdependent on each other,” he said.

Concerns about damage to property values and the potential effects of wind towers on the beauty of the region – and on the tourist dollars that go with it – surfaced frequently.Kathy Pendleton of Mountain View Road said the proposal, which would put eight towers in Alexandria and 15 in Danbury, would result in several turbine towers directly in front of her home’s beautiful view.

“I pay a view tax for my view,” she said. “I’m not going to pay the view tax to view industrial turbines.”

Resident Bob Piehler agreed. Wind towers “are cute from 50 miles away, but they are not cute if they are a mile away,” he said.

Others challenged Iberdrola’s stance that there is support in the area for the project. One resident called for a town vote on the issue. In March, residents voted 3-to-1 against the proposal on a ballot question.

Source:  By DAN SEUFERT, Union Leader Correspondent | November 06, 2013 | www.unionleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky