[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Peru officials are biased on turbines 

Credit:  Berkshire Eagle | 11/02/2013 | www.berkshireeagle.com ~~

I have to admit I’m not much involved in Peru town politics. I guess I always thought that the well-intentioned people of town government were there looking after my best interests and let it go at that. But lately mainly due to my own personal observations at Selectmen and planning board meetings, I’ve begun to question that belief.

Although a permit to build five (maybe more) huge wind turbine towers in the town of Peru has not been granted as of yet, many on the board of Selectmen and planning board members that the selectmen have appointed, are acting as though this is a done deal. I have observed the concerns of citizens, concerns with health effects, noise, bird and bat kills, blasting the tops of mountains for the sites, or any issues which may go counter to a permit going forward, met with eye-rolling and down-talking by our town officials. Meanwhile these same officials stare transfixed hanging on every word of the developers and proponents of the towers, nodding their agreement like the bobblehead dog in the back window of my grandmother’s Chevy.

We all know about the inadequate process of changing the town bylaws to allow this in the first place, all the corporate teasers the town has been promised in the form of tax dollars to be paid, and big money land lease deals to land owners who provide the sites. I’m sure other deals are in the works here, but my point is this – town officials should not be demonstrating bias on this issue. In light of growing dissent and the legitimate concerns of town folks, anything less than an unbiased approach to this issue should give us all pause to question who they work for and whose side they are really on.



Source:  Berkshire Eagle | 11/02/2013 | www.berkshireeagle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky