LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Legal setback for anti-wind farm residents 

Credit:  By ROSEMARY BOLGER | The Advocate | Nov. 1, 2013 | www.theadvocate.com.au ~~

King Island residents have suffered a set back in their legal bid to stop Hydro Tasmania going ahead with a $2 billion wind farm on the island.

The No TasWind Farm Group have been ordered to narrow the scope of its legal claim which was described by Justice Duncan Kerr as ”sprawling and inarticulate”.

Hydro Tasmania has moved to have the application struck out and is also seeking security of costs from the group.

During a Federal Court hearing this morning in Hobart, barrister Andrew Wood admitted his client did not have the resources to pay adverse legal costs.

However, he said there were other things to consider such as the significance of the case and referred to the Tasmanian Conservation Trust’s case against Gunns which was allowed to proceed without security provided.

The group is arguing Hydro failed to gain broad community support for the project after repeatedly stating that it would not go ahead with a feasibility study without 60 per cent of residents in favour.

Hydro Tasmania has denied the allegations and says the 60 per cent figure was never set as a pre-requisite.

The matter has been adjourned to November 22 for the group to reconsider its position.

A Hydro spokeswoman said the legal action had not delayed work on preparations for the development.

Source:  By ROSEMARY BOLGER | The Advocate | Nov. 1, 2013 | www.theadvocate.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky