[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Fears for birds over £450m sea energy park ease  

Credit:  Yorkshire Post | 26 October 2013 | www.yorkshirepost.co.uk ~~

The Government’s wildlife adviser appears to have softened its stance over concerns that have been delaying a decision on a £450m marine energy park.

Able UK wants to build Europe’s largest offshore wind park on the south bank of the Humber – but the site it has chosen is one of the top sites in the country for black-tailed godwits.

In August the Government said it was “minded to approve” the plans, but asked for more information on measures to mitigate the loss of the mudflats, which are essential to the birds’ survival.

It followed a warning from Natural England that there was a “substantial risk” that proposals to create new feeding grounds for the birds at Cherry Cobb Sands might not work.

But a spokesman for Natural England said yesterday: “Based on extra information provided, we have said there is a residual level of risk – a lower level of risk. The “regulated tidal exchange” which has been suggested is a novel approach in this country so we can’t be absolutely guaranteed that it will work. But the extra information gives us more confidence.

“Our view of the risk is that it is reduced – but it is not entirely without risk.”

No one was available from Able UK yesterday.

Agents for Able have, however, written to the Department of Transport to say they believe enough progress has been made on the two outstanding issues holding up the decision – the compensation measures for the birds and assurances that the project will not jeopardise the Killingholme Branch Railway – for the Secretary of State to grant consent. A final decision is due by December 18.

But the tenant farmer who stands to lose 250 acres of land at Cherry Cobb Sands to provide the new habitat, Stephen Kirkwood, said Able’s response was “virtually the same information as they had put forward before” providing little in the way of “new data or real science” to counter the concerns raised by the RSPB and Natural England.

He said: “I am not an ecologist, but I really cannot see how destroying a habitat necessary for the black-tailed godwits, without providing an immediate alternative habitat, would work.

“If the alternative habitat is not going to be functional for five to six years after the loss of habitat where are these black-tailed godwits going to go in the meantime?

“And if they can go somewhere else why is compensatory habitat needed at huge cost in the first place?”

His consultant Roger Morris, who has been involved in most of the major port development in England since 1998, said the Government was in a difficult position, Able having “simply provided more arguments that their proposal is acceptable”.

He said: “They haven’t advanced the science and to be perfectly honest I don’t think we can advance the science. It has not been tried and is a huge risk.”

The scheme which would represent the single biggest investment in renewables on the Humber so far, could see the creation of a new quay and facilities for the manufacture, assembly and storage of components for the vast wind farms planned for the North Sea.

Able has previously described its plans as a “once in a generation opportunity to transform the area and bring enormous benefits to the UK as a whole”.

The RSPB, which had previously raised concerns about the destruction of the birds’ habitat, has yet to respond.

Source:  Yorkshire Post | 26 October 2013 | www.yorkshirepost.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.