[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Energy debate  

Credit:  The Scotsman | www.scotsman.com ~~

The Scottish Wild Land Group has long been calling for greater transparency and accountability in relation to energy strategy, our opinion being that only a more informed community of citizens can participate knowledgeably in the debate on this policy called for by Alistair Phillips-Davies, chief executive of SSE, (Cabinet split emerges over green charges “that raise family fuel bills” your report, 
12 October).

The wind lobby has not shown any willingness to participate in such a debate until now. Will the Scottish Government now be prepared to respond positively? After all, surely in recent years no minister has been faced with a group of citizens so determined not to be ignored as those who oppose – for a variety of social, economic, democratic and environmental reasons – the activities of wind farmers, many of whom are based furth of Scotland and who show a total disregard for our internationally renowned landscapes.

Two cases recently have demonstrated robust local democracy in action. The first was the success of Christine Metcalfe of Avich and Kilchrenan Community Council (Argyll) in taking a complaint against the UK government and the European Union to the Aarhus Compliance Committee of the United Nations Economic Council for Europe. The committee ruled that each of the aforementioned had failed in their obligations under the Aarhus Convention to inform and consult the people in the development and implementation of their renewable energy programmes. The second case was the recent judicial review petitioned for by Sustainable Shetland, a group of local citizens who oppose the Viking wind farm.

Now it is possible that Lady Clark’s decision, to the effect that since Viking Energy did not have a licence to generate electricity the application to build the wind farm was incompetent, will be overturned on appeal. But the point has been made. No matter the eventual impact on government policies, ministers must surely be taking notice of these two milestone cases in the history of our democracy which are but the tip of the iceberg.

John Milne

Scottish Wild Land Group

Source:  The Scotsman | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.