LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Dorset councillors to cite tourism and seascape concerns in Navitus wind farm response 

Credit:  By Melanie Vass | Daily Echo | www.bournemouthecho.co.uk ~~

Dorset councillors are expected to cite concerns over tourism and the seascape as they agree their official response to the Navitus Bay wind farm plans today.

Planning committee members are being recommended to agree a holding response that can be sent to Navitus Bay Development Limited (NBDL) by the looming October 11 deadline.

This will agree that the proposal could offer significant benefits to Dorset but will also set out concerns that they have been provided with “insufficient detail” to fully quantify the impact the 218-turbine wind park will have.

Councillors are also expected to criticise the “out of date” information provided about its potential effect on tourism and question whether it could lead to the loss of the Jurassic Coast’s World Heritage status.

The report that will be considered at County Hall this afternoon includes a summary of findings from consultants commissioned to provide advice on the technical aspects of the seascape and landscape visual impact assessment.

They checked the images provided both by NBDL and by wind farm opponents Challenge Navitus and concluded that both were useful and compliant with relevant standards and neither had been set up to deliberately mislead.

However, they expressed “disappointment” that NBDL declined their request for 70mm or 75mm focal length single frame printed images that would provide a clearer picture of what the development would look like.

The consultants also confirmed the wind park could not sited entirely out of sight of land if it is to stay within the current development site boundary. But they say visual intrusion could be reduced by choosing a different location.

n Bournemouth cabinet members will consider their official response to the controversial proposals at their meeting next Wednesday. They too are expected to express concerns about the impact on tourism and the local economy.

Source:  By Melanie Vass | Daily Echo | www.bournemouthecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky