LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm scheme rejected 

Credit:  Oct 8 2013 by Iain Howie, Perthshire Advertiser | www.perthshireadvertiser.co.uk ~~

A controversial planning bid for seven wind turbines in south-west Perthshire has been blocked by the Scottish Government.

The Frandy Hill site at Glendevon in the Ochils was looked at by the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals, which has rejected the wind farm.

Developers Wind Prospect called on the DPEA to make the decision after arguing Perth and Kinross Council had failed to reach a decision.

Dismissing the appeal DPEA Reporter Malcolm Mahony said: “[The wind farm] fails to minimise its visual and landscape impacts, particularly when seen in combination with other wind farms.

“It would result in wind farms becoming a key characteristic of the more elevated Ochils to the west of Glen Devon.”

Mr Mahony looked at a range of issues, from landscape and visual impact to energy policy, when considering the application.

He also said neighbouring Clackmannanshire Council had refused the nine-turbine Rhodders wind farm and an application was also in to extend Burnfoot Hill, all within a short distance.

In his appraisal he referred to PKC’s stance that the build-up of wind farms around Strathearn could appear “fragmented” and “cluttered”.

He said: “Few viewpoints would offer a balanced composition. A dominant, linear skyline impression would be gained from many viewpoints.”

Weighing up government support for green energy and the visual and environmental impacts, he found the balance tipped toward rejection.

Source:  Oct 8 2013 by Iain Howie, Perthshire Advertiser | www.perthshireadvertiser.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon