[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windmill farm seeks permit to kill eagles  

Credit:  Originally published as "Windfarm to get permission to kill eagles" | Peter Fimrite | San Francisco Chronicle | Thursday, September 26, 2013 | www.sfgate.com ~~

A large wind farm in Solano County would be the first renewable energy project in the nation to be issued a permit to kill eagles under a plan released Thursday by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The proposal, outlined in a draft environmental report, is to issue a golden eagle take permit to the Shiloh IV Wind Project, on 3,500 acres in the Montezuma Hills between Rio Vista and Fairfield.

The unusual plan would allow the company’s 50 wind turbines to kill up to five golden eagles over a five-year period in exchange for a series of measures to protect the big birds, including the retrofitting of 133 nearby power poles to prevent electrocutions.

“The bottom line is a permit will help preserve eagles,” said Scott Flaherty, the deputy assistant regional director of external affairs for the Fish and Wildlife Service. “I think it really does set a precedent. It shows the service can work with wind energy companies … and ensure that we conserve eagles and other wildlife.”

The report, which will now go through a 45-day public comment period, analyzed four alternatives, including the possibility of denying the permit application. In addition to retrofitting the Pacific Gas and Electric Co. power poles, Shiloh, which is an affiliate of EDF Renewable Development, has agreed to use audio or visual deterrence measures to scare away eagles, migratory birds and bats.

The 102-megawatt plant was built in 2012 adjacent to three other existing wind energy facilities. The company’s 153-foot-long turbine blades replaced 230 turbines built on the site in the 1980s. Each new turbine can generate as much electricity as 15 older windmills.

The Shiloh facilities, which were constructed west of Rio Vista starting in 2006, are part of a statewide program to increase renewable-energy generation and combat global warming. State law requires utilities to get 33 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by the end of 2020. Roughly 20 percent of PG&E’s electricity sales now come from renewable energy.

The problem is that windmills do kill birds, which have a tendency to fly into the blades. Eight eagles a year are killed at the four Shiloh plants, according to Fish and Wildlife estimates. About 16 eagles die annually in the entire Montezuma Hills region, which has several other wind farms.

Eric Davis, the service’s assistant regional director for migratory birds and state programs, said investigations of bird deaths have been initiated and turned over to the Department of Justice, but there have yet to be any prosecutions under the federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.

“There is no law out there that says this project requires a take permit, (but) eagles are protected,” Davis said. “If they did not receive a permit, they could build the project and they would be in compliance with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act until the first eagle was taken. Then they would be subject to enforcement action.”

The Audubon Society and other conservation organizations have been pushing for stronger regulations. Davis said he hopes that approval of the take permit for Shiloh will lead to agreements with other windmill companies around the state.

The report is at http://www.fws.gov/cno/pdf/ShilohIV-ECP-DEA.pdf.

Source:  Originally published as "Windfarm to get permission to kill eagles" | Peter Fimrite | San Francisco Chronicle | Thursday, September 26, 2013 | www.sfgate.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Wildlife

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.