LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

If decision to reject a wind farm is appealed for the second time then taxpayers should not have to pay the costs, says councillor 

Credit:  Edward Curwen | News & Crier | 25 September 2013 | www.cambridge-news.co.uk ~~

Taxpayers should not have to pay for another expensive appeal if a wind farm developer challenges planners for a second time, a councillor has said.

Broadview Energy had their revised plans for a three-turbine wind farm near Kimbolton rejected last week by Huntingdonshire District Council.

It was the second time the company had been knocked back by planners.

And their original submission was only defeated after a lengthy and expensive inquiry.

Jonathan Gray represents Kimbolton and Staughton – where the wind farm was proposed – at Huntingdonshire District Council.

He said: “Between the action group [Stop Bicton Wind Farm] and the council well over six figures was spent on the first appeal.

“And if there is any appeal we’ll put the same amount of effort in again.

“It’s very unusual for us as a council to apply for costs, but my personal opinion is there isn’t enough difference between the two applications and as a council we should try to recover costs. I will be pressing for that.

“If we’re going to have a credible planning policy we have to defend it. The message coming to me from residents and across the county is we have got enough of these things in Huntingdonshire. We’re just surrounded by them.”

Huntingdonshire District Council have not yet received an appeal from Broadview.

After the decision last week Tom Cosgrove of Broadview Energy said: “We are currently considering our options.”

Source:  Edward Curwen | News & Crier | 25 September 2013 | www.cambridge-news.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon