[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Controversial Atlantic Array wind farm plan ‘is in disarray’ 

Credit:  By Adam Walmesley | Western Morning news | September 25, 2013 | www.thisiscornwall.co.uk ~~

A Westcountry MP has said there is “growing momentum” against one of the biggest offshore wind farms in the world.

Conservative Geoffrey Cox spoke of a “very strong” surge of opposition in his Torridge and West Devon constituency as well as in North Devon over the controversial Atlantic Array project – a wind farm proposed off the Westcountry coast.

“People feel the burden of impact has been disproportionately placed on communities in Devon and yet, unlike in South Wales, it is unlikely to benefit us,” he said.

Mr Cox’s comments came yesterday evening after Torridge District Council performed a U-turn on Monday night over its decision to support the 240-turbine scheme.

The multi-billion pound project for the 220-metre high turbines built nine miles (16km) off the North Devon coast was rejected by North Devon Council earlier this month.

Bob Barfoot, chairman of the CPRE North Devon branch, said: “The Atlantic Array development is in a state of disarray within the district councils as well as the county council.”

RWE npower renewables – the company behind the plans – said it had worked to reduce the visual impact of the turbines. It said the wind farm would produce enough power for the average needs of 900,000 homes.

But Mr Cox said there were fears that the impact would be “too heavy” on the local community and that RWE had done “too little” to alleviate those concerns.

“The Atlantic Array project is a recipe for real anxiety. There will be major visibility from the coastline and the decision on Monday night does not surprise me,” he said.

Torridge councillors voted to withdraw their support “in the interests of the residents and the businesses of the Torridge District” after Councillor Chris Leather put forward a motion not to support the wind farm.

Mr Barfoot praised the decisions of both Torridge and North Devon Councils after Devon County Council voted in support of the scheme.

“Pressure may have been put on councillors not to object to the scheme, but in their decisions they have shown a degree of common sense,” he said.

Earlier this month Torridge’s planning committee decided not to raise any objections, but the full council voted on Monday by 15 votes to seven against the scheme. A Torridge District council spokesman admitted the two decisions were “a bit odd”.

North Devon Councillors voted a fortnight ago to reject the wind farm due to the lack of economic benefit to the area, damage to the beauty of north Devon and tourism, and its closeness to the coast.

A spokesman declared that its councillors were “all singing from the same hymn sheet”.

In South Wales Reynoldston Community Council recently resolved to object on visual impact grounds after Swansea City Council voted last year to oppose the scheme.

The offshore wind farm would be double the size of any currently operating in the UK if the plans are accepted by the Government which will have the final decision on the development.

Source:  By Adam Walmesley | Western Morning news | September 25, 2013 | www.thisiscornwall.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky