[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Ocotillo residents’ woes continue as new dust storm, flooding, white sludge flow strikes community  

Credit:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | September 8, 2013 | eastcountymagazine.org ~~

A new dust storm, flooding and more white foam flowed through Ocotillo today, heightening residents’ concerns about impacts of Pattern Energy’s Ocotillo Express Wind Energy Facility on this desert community. At 4:40 p.m., a storm hit, sending massive amounts of dust into the air, this time coming directly from project access dirt roads created by Pattern Energy, according to Jim Pelley, who shot this video. Soon after, a storm brought flash flooding, which residents claim is worsened by drainage changes made by the wind developer. The flood brought a repeat of an unknown white sludgy substance washing across the desert floor and into the town.

“The white foam is back moving across the project. It was a bit eerie,” said Pelly, who took video of today’s white foam flood as well.

“Dust was never an issue in Ocotillo before the project,” Ocotillo resident Bill Pate observed. Dust storms have become more frequent and more severe since the project’s completion, with some resembling Dust Bowl era dust storms – a phenomenon that has occurred in Texas and Arizona at places in close proximity to massive wind and solar projects that scraped bare the desert, as occurred in Ocotillo.

The dust storms raise concerns over Valley Fever and respiratory conditions such as asthma. Residents have advised ECM that Imperial Valley is not requiring testing of Valley Fever patients who present with pneumonia-like symptoms even though in Arizona, a high percentage of such patients are found to have Valley Fever.

Residents asking for a Valley Fever test in Ocotillo have been advised that unless a doctor recommends the test, the cost is prohibitively high – nearly a thousand dollars in some cases.

“It’s almost as if they were punishing us for daring to question the exposure. So what this means is that if you go to your doctor’s and just ask for the test, then insurance won’t cover it,” said Linda Ewing, who was charged $685 for the test.

Imperial Valley resident Edie Harmon asked, “Why don’t the ERs in Imperial County have tests ordered for Valley Fever for the more than 33 % of cases of Community Acquired Pneumonia for which no pathogen was identified? Surely, the cost of the test is far less than the cost of treating the illness if not diagnosed or properly treated earlier when patients first seek treatment.”

A recent article on prisoner deaths from Valley Fever notes that many fatalities could have been avoided with earlier testing.

As for the foam that residents fear could be residue from herbicides sprayed at the site and/or chemicals used for dust suppression in the wind project’s construction—chemicals they fear may contaminate the town’s only drinking water supply–, authorities have provided no answers yet despite questions raised in our August 30th article titled “What’s polluting the waterways in Ocoitllo?” following the latest white foam flood.

We also ran a story in July 2012 raising the same questions. Residents complained of third-world conditions after flammable dust suppression chemicals flooded the town, even washing onto yards where children play. No cleanup was ever ordered.

See also our prior coverage of severe dust storms in Ocotillo:

http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/node/13843; http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/node/13829 ; http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/node/10795 .

Where are public health officials? Why is nothing being done to stop these hazards and protect residents from water pollution, chemical runoff and extreme dust?

Communities in other areas weighing potential wind projects should consider the long-term consequences to residents—and the failure of public officials to protect the public health, when considering whether or not to approve more massive energy projects on public lands.

Source:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | September 8, 2013 | eastcountymagazine.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch