LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Array opponents hail EU porpoise ruling 

Credit:  Tony Gussin | North Devon Gazette | September 4, 2013 | www.northdevongazette.co.uk ~~

The power of European red tape could halt the march of the Atlantic Array wind farm if campaigners get their way.

The humble harbour porpoise could become an Achilles heel after it emerged the European Commission has asked the government why it failed to set up designated sites for the protected species.

This includes the outer Bristol Channel and it says schemes such as the Array have been allowed to ‘potentially progress’ without sufficient regard for protecting the species as required by EU law.

The Brussels machine has leap into life and begun ‘infringement action for non compliance with Community law’, hitting the UK with a ‘letter of formal notice’, the first stage in the process.

It follows a complaint to the commission by North Devon campaign group Save Our Marine Mammals, which believes the proposed 240 turbines will prove harmful to the creatures.

The Porthcawl Environmental Trust has also complained, and the World Wildlife Fund has submitted an expert report.

Yelland campaigner Joanne Bell, press officer for Save Our Marine Mammals, said it was ‘a massive step forward’ in the battle against the Array: “Our government has been going against the rule of law to get these turbines put in,” she said.

“It’s not just us complaining that they haven’t done their home work, it’s the EU too.”

The government’s response to the Commission was submitted by Defra on August 20 and it will take around six weeks for analysis.

If it feels the UK has not complied, the matter could go all the way to the European Court of Justice, although it appears most matters are resolved before that stage.

A Defra spokesperson said it could not comment on the Commission’s letter because it was ongoing, but added: “We are working to identify further sites to protect this important species in line with EU requirements.

“Already we have taken action including introducing measures to prevent accidental entanglement in fishing nets.”

Developer RWE said it did not wish to comment at this stage.

Source:  Tony Gussin | North Devon Gazette | September 4, 2013 | www.northdevongazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky