[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

UMaine keeps wind project details secret  

Credit:  By Tux Turkel, Staff Writer | Portland Press Herald | Posted September 3, 2013 | www.pressherald.com ~~

AUGUSTA – A business partnership led by the University of Maine has submitted a highly anticipated proposal for a demonstration offshore wind power project to state utility regulators.

The proposal will shed light on what consumers can expect to pay for renewable wind energy generated off the coast of Maine – at least in its developmental stages.

But initial assessments will be difficult because UMaine has chosen to keep the entire 100-page document from public view.

So at least for the time being, the public is unable to learn what customers would pay for the electricity or get a sense of the overall economic potential of a venture meant to advance Maine’s standing as a center of research and construction in deep water ocean energy.

UMaine’s proposal, like a competing bid submitted last winter by Statoil, a Norwegian energy company that also wants to build an offshore wind project, will likely offer power at costs considerably above what consumers are now paying for electricity generated from burning fossil fuels or hydroelectric dams.

But the lack of information makes it impossible for now to compare UMaine’s plan with the Hywind Maine project approved last winter by the Maine Public Utilities Commission. Hywind Maine, Statoil’s project, involves a $120 million floating wind turbine project off Boothbay Harbor.

The 12-megawatt Hywind Maine wind park would generate enough energy annually to power roughly 8,000 homes, through a power purchase agreement for 27 cents per kilowatt hour. That’s well above market rates, but the terms also called for Statoil to provide certain economic benefits tied to job creation and in-state investment.

That didn’t satisfy Gov. Paul LePage, a vocal opponent of wind power. He argued that the rate was too high and the economic benefits too low. In exchange for allowing a sweeping energy bill to become law this summer, LePage engineered a political maneuver in the waning days of the legislative session. The end result was that lawmakers voted to order the PUC to reopen the bid process for offshore wind proposals.

That created a two-month window for UMaine to submit a bid for a project it’s developing, called VolturnUS. The university and its partners submitted the bid last Friday, the deadline for the application.


In a statement released Tuesday, the university said its proposal is based on a full-scale pilot farm that meets the requirements of the PUC request and on a smaller prototype it is now is testing off Castine.

“UMaine believes this is a strong proposal from the newly formed Maine-based company Aqua Ventus I, GP LLC – a company formed by Cianbro, Emera and Maine Prime Technologies LLC – to commercialize UMaine’s floating wind turbine technology,” the university said.

The PUC said Tuesday the three-member commission will deliberate on the case and make a decision by Dec. 31. No specific date has been set for deliberations.

LePage’s maneuver also prompted Statoil to announce in early July that it was putting Hywind Maine on hold, citing the uncertainty created by the new bidding process. The company said it would re-evaluate the project this fall.

But it’s unclear when Statoil, or the public, will have more details about what UMaine is proposing. Elizabeth Swain, a consultant in Maine for Statoil, said Tuesday she could not immediately reach company officials in Norway for comment on UMaine’s filing.

In reopening the bid proposal, the PUC set out six broad requirements, beyond electric rates. They include that the bidder has the technical and financial capacity to build and operate the project; that it has experience in the deep-water offshore wind industry; that it will invest in manufacturing facilities in Maine; and that it can quantify the economic benefits of the project, such as buying goods from local suppliers.

Documents filed at the PUC typically are put into an online site for public inspection. By law and rule, though, bidders are allowed to designate commercial information as confidential. This is a way to keep business strategies and proposed prices from competitors.

The PUC is authorized to place the information under a protective order and nondisclosure agreements. In this instance, electric utilities and the state’s public advocate will be able to see the documents, but on a confidential basis.

This process allows the utilities and public advocate to comment on the proposal as it’s reviewed by the PUC staff. The goal in this instance is to develop the terms of a 20-year contract for the wind power project.

It’s up to the university to make any of the information public, according to Harry Lanphear, a spokesman for the PUC.

“There may be a public version of the document that is put out to comment from the general public,” he said. “It’s too early in the process to determine precisely what type of comment process will occur.”

Statoil launched the world’s first full-scale floating turbine in 2009 in the North Sea. It was looking to Maine to expand and refine the technology.

The UMaine partners launched a one-eighth-scale prototype of their project in May off Castine. At full scale, a $96 million project located off Monhegan Island would generate 12 megawatts.

Both projects also are in competition with offshore wind proposals nationally for $50 million in federal energy funds. That decision is expected this winter.


The university’s action caught industry representatives off guard. It seems counter to the intent of the governor and the Legislature, according to Jeremy Payne, executive director of the Maine Renewable Energy Association.

“I was surprised that the university’s application was confidential, from top to bottom,” Payne said. “It doesn’t seem to be the most transparent way. How is the general public, the industry and policymakers to know what to support?”

Payne said he also expects UMaine’s power contract proposal to be well above market rates, which is to be expected for any small-scale project. Commercial-scale versions of both VolturnUS and Hywind Maine will be designed to compete with market rates after 2020, their developers say.

The lack of information also was troubling to Martin Grimnes, founder of Harbor Technologies in Brunswick. The company makes composite components for port facilities. Grimnes had met in Norway with Statoil about potential future opportunities in Maine and Atlantic Canada.

“Statoil is a commercial giant that already has committed its muscle to wind,” Grimnes said. “UMaine has done valuable work, and I’m not belittling that. But it’s more research and development.”

The potential synergy between UMaine’s composites research and Statoil’s commercial expertise had been the basis for an earlier partnership between the two parties. That synergy apparently has been lost, at least for now, through the actions of LePage and the Legislature.

But a letter written a year ago this week highlights the level of support that UMaine formerly had for Statoil.

The letter was sent to the PUC while the agency was reviewing Statoil’s project bid. It was written by Paul Ferguson, the university’s president; Jack Ward, an assistant vice president; and Habib Dagher, director of the Advanced Structures and Composites Center, and a key figure in bringing Statoil to Maine.

“Attracting Statoil is like attracting Apple, GM or Google to Maine,” they wrote.

They noted that Maine was at an economic crossroads, and set out a case for how one of the world’s leading oil and gas companies could help commercialize offshore wind in Maine.

Source:  By Tux Turkel, Staff Writer | Portland Press Herald | Posted September 3, 2013 | www.pressherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.