[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plymouth Planning Board members camp out near turbine 

Credit:  By Emily Dravenstadt | Wicked Local Plymouth | Posted Aug 29, 2013 | www.wickedlocal.com ~~

So, how loud are they?

That has been the burning question about wind turbines since developers have been banging on Plymouth’s door to erect them all over town. The 75-foot wind turbine erected in the Camelot Industrial Park, by Joe Balboni and several partners, was the first and remains the only industrial-size wind turbine built in Plymouth.

After hearing many concerns from neighborhoods objecting to wind turbines, Planning Board Chairman Paul McAlduff and Vice Chairman Tim Grandy set out to discover just how annoying, if at all, a wind turbine could be.

McAlduff and Grandy camped out Friday night 500 feet from the Balboni turbine in Camelot Park. They erected a tent on Balboni’s land abutting one of the Camelot businesses and logged what they heard.

And the results of their experiment are in.

During the early evening they couldn’t hear the turbine at all, McAlduff said. Though they could hear a little noise from the spinning blades at night, it wasn’t disturbing. What woke them was the sound of the sprinkler system turning on around 2:30 a.m.

“We got hit by four separate sprinkler heads,” McAlduff said. “For over an hour it was pounding on the tent. Thank God the tent was waterproof. Later on, after the sprinkler shut off, you could hear the turbine a little.”

Grandy likened the sound of the turbine to the engine in a jet droning overhead. He also heard a small squeaking sound, but noted that, if he’d been inside a home, he probably wouldn’t have heard anything at all.

The experiment didn’t change McAlduff’s mind about wind turbines. They should probably be at least double the distance from the ground to the tip of blade from any homes, he said, adding that industrial wind turbines should be at least 1,200 feet from residences.

Grandy said wind turbines shouldn’t be located near residences period, due to their potential for causing health problems and adversely impacting property values.

A bylaw that requires McAlduff’s suggested setback would rule out the plan for a 275-foot wind turbine behind Stop & Shop, which is proposed to be built 600 feet from the Algonquin Heights apartment complex and 962 feet from the nearest home on Westerly Road. McAlduff said he was one of the two votes in favor of recommending the Zoning Board of Appeals grant the special permit for this project, but said he was simply standing behind the town’s current wind power bylaws.

“The Energy Committee is proposing changing the bylaw,” he added. “But, for me they’ve made it too restrictive.”

The Planning Board voted, 3-2, last week in favor of the proposed amendment to the town’s zoning bylaws that would create a Wind Facilities Overlay District, which would corral wind turbines greater than 100 feet in height within its borders. The proposed amendment would also prohibit turbines greater than 350 feet in height. But, even if Town Meeting approves the changes this fall, the Stop & Shop wind turbine proposal and any others in the pipeline now would be grandfathered under the town’s current bylaws.

McAlduff said the 100-foot restriction renders it impossible to erect a turbine outside these proposed zones since such a turbine would be too short to generate wind power. That’s why he voted against the proposal, he said.

McAlduff said he supports wind power, but is also in favor of some restrictions.

But Grandy said he supports the Energy Committee’s bylaw amendment.

“I feel it’s a good alternative to what we currently have,” he said. “The one we have is antiquated and doesn’t do a good job of protecting residents of the town of Plymouth.”

Source:  By Emily Dravenstadt | Wicked Local Plymouth | Posted Aug 29, 2013 | www.wickedlocal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky