[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Questions arise over Caliboso’s new job; The former PUC chairman had voted on an energy project he now represents 

Credit:  By Alan Yonan Jr. | Honolulu Star-Advertiser | Aug 21, 2013 | www.staradvertiser.com ~~

Carlito Caliboso, the former state Public Utilities Commission chairman who now represents a wind energy proj­ect that he voted on during his PUC tenure, is being asked by authorities to explain why switching sides doesn’t represent a conflict of interest.

Caliboso left the PUC in August 2011 to take a job at a local law firm specializing in energy and regulated utilities. Last month he began filing documents with the PUC on behalf of Castle & Cooke Properties, the company developing a planned wind energy proj­ect on Lanai.

Caliboso headed the PUC in 2010 when it voted 2-1 to waive competitive bidding requirements and allowed the Lanai project to move forward.

Current PUC Chairwoman Hermina Morita sent a letter to Caliboso on Thursday citing the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct, which restrict the ability of lawyers to represent clients in matters in which they were previously involved as a government employee.

Morita asked Caliboso to “please provide written proof of your authority and qualifications to act as legal counsel for Castle & Cooke Properties Inc., including your compliance with the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct.”

Morita gave Caliboso until Friday to reply. She noted in her letter that under Hawaii Administrative Rules, the PUC has the authority to require anyone appearing before the commission to prove their qualifications.

Caliboso said he would reserve his comments for his letter to the PUC.

One of the purposes of the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct is to prevent lawyers from misusing confidential government information acquired during their time as a public employee. Morita cited three PUC dockets dealing with the proposed Lanai wind project in which Caliboso was involved in during his tenure as chairman.

The PUC in July opened a new docket to review the progress of the proposed Lanai project in light of several major developments, including Castle & Cooke’s sale of its majority ownership stake in Lanai to billionaire Oracle CEO Larry Ellison. Morita’s letter listed nine documents of a substantive nature in the new docket that Caliboso filed between Aug. 2 and Aug. 12 as Castle & Cooke’s attorney.

The Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct are administered by the state Supreme Court and spell out circumstances that can constitute a conflict of interest for lawyers. The rules are more restrictive than the state’s ethics law, which governs “post-employment” interaction between all government workers who leave their jobs for the private sector and the agency for which they previously worked.

Caliboso’s representation of Castle & Cooke does not violate that ethics law since a minimum one-year cooling-off period elapsed between his departure from the PUC and his representation of Castle & Cooke.

The Rules of Professional Conduct include several exceptions, including one that allows the disqualified lawyer’s firm to continue representing the client “only if the disqualified lawyer is timely screened from any participation in the matter and is apportioned no part of the fee therefrom.” In addition, the rules include an exception for cases in which the affected government agency gives its consent for the lawyer to continue representing the client.

Source:  By Alan Yonan Jr. | Honolulu Star-Advertiser | Aug 21, 2013 | www.staradvertiser.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky