News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Concerns over porpoises prompt EU action over offshore wind farm plan  

Credit:  By Rachael Misstear | Wales Online | 20 August 2013 | www.walesonline.co.uk ~~

The European Commission has stepped in over controversial plans to position one of the world’s biggest offshore wind farms between Wales and Devon.

The £3bn Atlantic Array wind farm between Cornwall and Swansea Bay would see around 250 turbines built between Lundy Island and Gower by Swindon-based RWE npower renewables.

But allowing the development, which includes the Outer Bristol Channel, would breach European Habitat Directives.

The EU Commission has confirmed it is taking infringement action against the UK Authorities for failing to adequately protect native harbour porpoises.

In a letter to the Porthcawl Environment Trust (PET) – which lodged a legal complaint alongside the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) – the European Commission said a letter of formal notice has been issued to the UK Government.

PET said it has been battling for eight years to ensure that harbour porpoises and their habitat was protected by the terms of the EU Habitats Directive.

The group claims the government is ignoring the importance of the Outer Bristol Channel site as a breeding site for the marine life because of its interest in developing offshore windfarms.

In its letter, the European Commission, said it had “received a wide ranging complaint and expert report on the failure to propose protection sites for the harbour porpoise from WWF”.

It added: “As a result of our investigations we have now decided to follow this matter up with infringement action under Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.”

The Commission raised concerns about the failure to identify for the protection of the harbour porpoise for a number of sites including the Outer Bristol Channel.

It concluded that the Government had failed to ensure compliance with its obligations under the Habitats Directive, and in turn failed to make any substantial contribution towards the establishment of a coherent network of sites for the species in breach of its obligations under that Directive.

It added : “Damaging activities such as fishing and projects with the potential to cause acoustic disturbance have not been adequately considered. These include, for example, offshore windfarm developments such as those being considered in the Outer Bristol Channel which are being allowed to progress potentially without sufficient regard to the needs of the protection of the species.”

Brain Saunders, spokesman for PET said the group formed a decade ago with the aim of ensuring that the harbour porpoise and their habitat was protected.

“In our view the current situation with regard to the Outer Bristol Channel has created a ‘political impasse’ and a conflict of interest.”

He said the Scarweather sandbank and the waters of the Outer Bristol Channel are used by the harbour porpoise as a breeding site and resting place.

“Scarweather is a spawning ground for the lesser sand eel, which is the main food supply for this species. The turbulent water there is an important learning ground for their young.

“Because the harbour porpoise are of a trans-boundary nature their natural range is also highly protected by Article 4 [of the EU Habitats Directive] which states that ‘their natural range must not be reduced, nor likely to be reduced in the near future’.

“The Government and its Nature Conservation Agencies favour off-shore wind farms, therefore it is not in their interest to comply with the Rule of Law laid down in the Habitats Directive as in this case the developer RWE has been granted a licence by the Crown Estate to build a large wind farm development in the Outer Bristol Channel.”

Nick Medic, RenewableUK’s director of offshore renewables, said: “The wind industry takes its responsibility to protect wildlife extremely seriously.

“Before an offshore wind farm is built, developers have to prove that it won’t have a detrimental effect by providing a robust Environmental Impact Assessment.

“Research has shown that offshore wind farms do in fact create havens for wildlife, and there are a number of on-going projects to mitigate any impact during the construction phase.

“Leading wildlife and conservation organisations, including WWF, repeatedly state that the biggest threat to wildlife is climate change, which is why they support wind power as a way of tackling the effects of global warming.”

Source:  By Rachael Misstear | Wales Online | 20 August 2013 | www.walesonline.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Wildlife

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.