LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine plan for farm on outskirts of Wisbech deferred after ‘flicker shadow’ protestors force fresh report 

Credit:  Tuesday, August 13, 2013 | Wisbech Standard | www.wisbechstandard.co.uk ~~

A farm on the outskirts of Wisbech has been told to produce a ‘full shadow flicker assessment’ before being allowed to erect a 25 metre tall wind turbine.

John Lankfer Produce Ltd, of Wisbech Road, West Walton, has applied for planning consent to West Norfolk Council for permission to install the turbine behind their farm.

The company claims the turbine, which would be built on land near Wisbech Town Football Club, would “not result in a great intrusion into the natural character of the landscape”.

But their plans met with opposition from a handful of residents whose fears of flicker shadow prompted councillors to defer a decision.

One objector said: “Our bedroom is less than 200m from the turbine which will cause a nuisance through noise and shadow flicker.”

Another neighbour gave five separate reasons for their objection to the wind turbine including noise, pollution and the possible danger to birds and insects.

He argued that if the farm wanted to grow to include a wind turbine “it should be “located on an industrial estate as opposed to a farming and flower growing area.

“The development will set a precedent for further turbines and industrial use within Walton Road, which is already subject to problems.”

Joanne Watson, the council’s neighbourhood nuisance officer, said she had some sympathy for the applicant and recognised it could be frustrating to be asked at a late stage for such a report.

However she said the application should have included such information “and the fact that a turbine is ‘small scale’ has no bearing on the fact that shadow flicker effects can still occur.

“This application had inaccuracies and omissions and it is unfortunate that the applicant now has to face a delay due to that.”

Source:  Tuesday, August 13, 2013 | Wisbech Standard | www.wisbechstandard.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky