[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Alton mulls restrictions on turbines, solar 

Credit:  By LINDA N. WELLER The Telegraph | August 7, 2013 | www.thetelegraph.com ~~

ALTON – Members of the Alton Plan Commission delayed voting on setting restrictions on solar panels and wind turbines Tuesday until they could obtain more information about the systems.

By unanimous vote, the committee of 10 citizens voted to lay over the issue until another meeting where knowledgeable visitors could speak to their concerns and describe various types of renewable energy systems.

Virginia Woulfe-Beile, of the Sierra Club-Piasa Palisades Group, offered to bring in knowledgeable people to a future meeting to discuss the equipment.

“I am happy this meeting is happening and you are talking about clean energy solutions in the city of Alton,” she said. “I understand your concerns. A lot of new technology addresses your concerns.”

The issue arose in part because of the city being named a Clean City. Also, the Illinois Power Agency Act will require 25 percent of energy for electricity must be from renewable energy sources by 2025, said Matt Asselmeier, deputy director of development and housing.

“There are no uniform regulations on size, location of solar panels or wind turbines” in the city, said Asselmeier, who brought the matter to the commission on behalf of the Climate Protection and Energy Efficiency Committee.

The committee spent several months researching and refining the proposal, he said.

Asselmeier said both the Appearance Review and Historical commissions already have studied and discussed the proposed changes to the Zoning Ordinance, which are based on ordinances in Naperville, Caseyville and Schaumburg, all in Illinois.

City inspector Doug Waggoner helped with the research, he said.

“Every effort was made to accommodate birds, bats and snakes,” he said about the turbine portion of the proposal, which sparked little discussion or review.

What drew the most questions and opinions was the height portion of the proposal, which would allow a building-mounted, small solar energy system to be posted up to 5 feet above the peak roof height, or above the maximum permitted height of a district, whichever is less. A free-standing small energy system could be 12 feet tall.

“It should be 5 inches instead of 5 feet,” Commissioner Anne Doucleff said. “They look bad enough. I would rather go more conservative” until someone convinces the commission that the ordinance should be adjusted.

Commissioner Terry Dooley, though, said if the city is too restrictive about the panels, it might discourage home sales in Alton.

Commissioner Bill Stoutenborough said the height should be different for commercial and residential structures.

“With residential, they should be flat on the roof,” he said. “The roof should be designed to hold a solar panel. I see a 5-foot panel elevation in a commercial area as being satisfactory. In a residential area, no.”

The proposed ordinance is seven pages long. Among its provisions is a ban on large wind energy systems; requiring a city building permit for installation of any renewable energy system, and it must comply with city building and safety codes; the plans must be prepared, signed and sealed by an Illinois licensed design professional; small, freestanding solar energy systems only would be allowed in back yards; and building-mounted small wind energy systems would have to be securely mounted to the roof of a principal structure, and located at least 2 feet from a public sidewalk.

The commission did not set a date for the meeting at which the proposal would be reviewed.

Source:  By LINDA N. WELLER The Telegraph | August 7, 2013 | www.thetelegraph.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky