[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Environmental hearings on DWP limited to serious health risks  

Credit:  By WES KELLER, For the Citizen | Orangeville Citizen | 2013-07-25 | www.citizen.on.ca/ ~~

The Environmental Review Tribunal (ERT) will consider only whether the Dufferin Wind Power project and its transmission line pose serious risks to human, animal and plant health or would cause irreversible damage to the environment, among similar considerations, the preliminary hearing was told Monday.

The actual hearing is set for Aug. 20 in Grace Tipling Hall, Shelburne. There’ll be a few familiar faces participating along with several lawyers of note who’ll be acting for some parties to the hearing.

Toronto lawyer Eric Gillespie is representing Dennis Sanford of Melancthon in opposition to the project. Mr. Gillespie gained turbine recognition in Chatham-Kent proceedings a couple of years ago, and is currently waging a multi-million-dollar battle over turbine leases near Stayner, among other actions.

Mr. Sanford has opposed turbines from the beginning of the Melancthon developments in 2006-07, and might be remembered for having repeated his 15-minute on them for the Amaranth Citizens Coalition in opposition to Phase 2 of that wind farm.

Joan Lever, also an opponent of turbines since the development of Melancthon Phase 1, is representing herself as a participant. In a somewhat lengthy and impassioned presentation

Monday, she made 17 points and outlined nine questions she said remained unanswered.

Not all of her points fall within the purview of the ERT. Lawyer Frederika Rotter, representing the Ministry of Environment, had no objection to Ms. Lever’s participation provided that she would be limited to the issues with which the ERT is mandated to deal.

Mayor Don MacIver is to appear for Amaranth. By motion, he said, his township council wants the rail-corridor transmission line to be underground the entire distance across the township. He said the township “has had experience with overhead wires” and has insisted that power lines be buried. His stance is that there is no need to have a 230-kv line from the wind farm to the Orangeville substation when a twin 69-kv one would suffice. DWP is expected to counter that the 230-kv line is needed because a 100MW transformer is to be built within the wind farm and not at the Hydro One substation.

(DWP began as Farm Owned Wind Power, a partnership between a group of farm owners and 401 Energy of Markham. The wind farm would be on property owned by members of the group. The transformer within the farm might avoid any noise problems such as have occurred at CHD/TransAlta’s substation in Amaranth.)

A Niagara Escarpment Commission manager appeared Monday to lodge an objection to the proximity of the wind farm to the escarpment. In part, the NEC’s opposition is to visual impact.

Amongst the heavy hitters, DWP is represented by Toronto’s Torys LLP, and Conserve Our Rural Environment (CORE) by the Toronto office of Davis LLP.

Davis lawyer Laura Bisset made representations for Dr. Crysdale of Mulmur whose property adjoins that of the most northerly farm within the DWP area at issue. She didn’t outline the doctor’s credentials but said his concerns are for human health.

Ms. Rotter objected to Dr. Crysdale’s participation on the basis, among other things, that he had previously withdrawn his appeal of the ministry’s issuance of a Renewable Energy Approval.

ERT chairman Paul Muldoon will outline his decisions on participation next Tuesday. From there, he is expected to enforce strict deadlines.

Mr. Muldoon told Monday’s pre-hearing that tribunal’s final decision on the REA would be “six months to the day” from the start of this proceeding.

Source:  By WES KELLER, For the Citizen | Orangeville Citizen | 2013-07-25 | www.citizen.on.ca/

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.