LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Court upholds permission for wind turbine 

Credit:  Nottingham Post | July 23, 2013 | www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/ ~~

Councils opposed to plans for a 71-metre-high wind turbine to serve a Notts farm have lost their High Court challenge to the proposal.

Newark and Sherwood District Council and Epperstone Parish Council had hoped a government planning inspector’s decision to approve the turbine at Hill Farm, Chapel Lane, Epperstone, would be quashed.

The farm is owned by JS Peake & Sons.

The councils argued the turbine would harm the landscape and would not generate enough electricity to justify its environmental impact.

The district council had previously refused planning permission, before the farm owners appealed.

On appeal the inspector granted permission, finding that, while the turbine would reduce the openness of the Green Belt, its slender structure and relatively compact base meant that the effect would only be modest.

This led the councils to seek the High Court challenge.

However, Deputy Judge Stephen Morris, QC, sitting in London, rejected their grounds of challenge in the case.

He said: “The inspector did not fail to resolve the dispute as to amount.

“Secondly, the inspector took that amount of electricity into account as a positive factor in favour of the grant of planning permission and as outweighing, with other benefits, harm arising from the inappropriate development.

“The inspector added that even if only the lower amount were to be generated, this would not have changed her mind because government policy is that ‘any small amount’ can be sufficient.”

Source:  Nottingham Post | July 23, 2013 | www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky