[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farms pose too big a risk for county  

Credit:  Written by Baker City Herald Editorial Board | July 19, 2013 | www.bakercityherald.com ~~

The debate over whether Baker County should welcome wind farms can be distilled to a cost-benefit analysis.

Would wind farms enrich the county more than they degrade it?

Our answer is no – a proliferation of wind turbines (there are just six in the county now) would not be to Baker County’s long-term advantage.

The attribute that is most at risk from wind farms is, we concede, a subjective one: aesthetics.

Some people hate to see turbines.

Some people like to watch them spin.

Still others don’t much care.

But we believe it’s beyond dispute that, were dozens of turbines built here, Baker County’s appearance would be changed dramatically.

This is no minor matter in a county where tourism is an important industry. And many of our visitors are attracted by our mountains, canyons and other picturesque scenery that is largely devoid of towers and other manmade distractions.

In this way Baker County is vastly different from the parts of the Columbia Basin where most of Oregon’s wind turbines stand now.

Wheat fields are attractive, to be sure, but they’re not exactly tourist attractions.

Wind farms could harm sage grouse habitat, and indirectly contribute to the bird being added to the federal endangered species list.

That could cause major problems for the beef cattle industry, the biggest sector of the county’s economy, because most of the county’s cows graze in areas that are, or possibly could be designated as, critical sage grouse habitat. Grazing could be limited, or prohibited, in those areas.

To be clear, we’re not opposed to alternative energy sources – including wind power – although it is troubling that these seem to depend so heavily on government subsidies.

Although the construction and operation of wind farms would bring dollars and jobs to the county, we doubt this economic boost would be substantial enough to offset the negative effects.

In any case, Baker County’s carbon footprint is already admirably tiny. Most of the kilowatts we consume are generated by the carbon-free hydro dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers.

Carbon emissions are a problem. But we don’t believe it’s wise – or, indeed, necessary – to jeopardize Baker County’s future as we pursue a needed solution to that problem.

Source:  Written by Baker City Herald Editorial Board | July 19, 2013 | www.bakercityherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.