LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County supports unwilling hosts 

Credit:  By Erika Engel | 10 July 2013 | www.simcoe.com ~~

No means no, when it comes to municipalities and wind farm projects, according to Grey County Council.

County councillors recently agreed the county would throw its support behind local municipalities declaring themselves unwilling or willing hosts to wind turbines and other Green Energy Act projects.

Councillors went a step further at the suggestion of Councillor Bob White (Hanover), who said municipalities should have authority from the province to enact bylaws prohibiting wind farms.

At least, said White, municipal councils should have veto power for wind turbine projects within their municipality.

The original motion before Grey County council was to support municipalities that declared themselves unwilling hosts for wind farm projects.

Councillor Paul McQueen (Grey Highlands) was the author of the motion, and said there were already seven of Grey County’s nine municipalities that had declared themselves unwilling hosts.

He further added there were 55 municipalities in the province also making similar declarations.

Council agreed to further open up the motion to support all municipal decisions on Green Energy Act projects after Councillor Brian Milne (Southgate) said he didn’t want to exclude municipalities who were willing to host wind farm projects.

“We shouldn’t influence or make decisions uncomfortable,” said Meaford Mayor Francis Richardson.

He was the only County councillor who voted against the motion. He said it represented obvious interference by the county, and was not objective and impartial, as he wished the county would remain.

With this motion, which will be circulated to local municipalities and provincial and federal politicians, is a request to the Ontario government to “grant authority to municipalities to deny wind turbines through the passage of bylaws or by power of veto.”

Source:  By Erika Engel | 10 July 2013 | www.simcoe.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky