LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Eight outdoors groups plead with Scots politicians to protect wild land 

Credit:  Liz Roberts, Reporter | grough | 04 July 2013 | www.grough.co.uk ~~

Eight leading bodies, including those representing outdoor enthusiasts, have called on the Scottish Government to increase protection for wild land.

The Mountaineering Council of Scotland and Ramblers Scotland are among the groups urging MSPs to back stronger powers to protect the nation’s scenic areas.

The move follows controversy over the building of windfarms and hilltracks which opponents say detract from the quality of Scotland’s wild areas and risk harming tourism.

Leaders of the organisations, the Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland, the John Muir Trust, the Mountaineering Council of Scotland, the Munro Society, the National Trust for Scotland, Ramblers Scotland, the Scottish Rights of Way and Access Society and the Scottish Wild Land Group – between them representing over 350,000 members – said they welcome moves by the Scottish Government and Scottish Natural Heritage to safeguard Scotland’s landscapes but say that their existing proposals do not go far enough.

A joint open letter from them said: “We support the increased protection proposed for national parks and national scenic areas, although this merely formalises the present de facto position.

“Such protection should apply also where development is proposed beyond their boundaries that would impact on the very qualities they were established to safeguard.”

The organisations also questioned whether or not the wording of the draft Scottish planning policy and national planning framework is tight enough.

They said: “The current draft states that, in national nature reserves, wild land and other important areas, wind-power developments will be acceptable ‘where it can be demonstrated that any significant effects on the qualities for which the area is identified can be substantially improved by siting, design or mitigation.’

“This will allow inappropriate developments to be approved because of lack of clarity in using subjective words such as ‘significant’ and ‘substantially’ when set against the primacy afforded in Government policy to economic and energy development.”

The letter raises concerns that local decision making risks being undermined by Scottish Government decisions. “If local authorities and their electorates think particular local landscapes are important then this should not be over-ridden nationally,” it said.

Kenneth Calman, chairman of the National Trust for Scotland, said: “As MSPs return to their constituencies over the summer we hope that all, whether in Government or opposition, give serious consideration to the landscape around them and what it represents for the people they represent.

“Recent surveys, such as the one undertaken by the John Muir Trust and one conducted by my own charity, show that a majority of Scots are very greatly concerned about the future of our wild land and local landscapes.

“This is why we have come together to put our names to this open letter – our landscapes need better protection and this is what the people of Scotland want.

“Our iconic landscapes are key to our economic and environmental future and our collective wellbeing. They must not be sacrificed to over-development through oversight or short-term thinking.”

Source:  Liz Roberts, Reporter | grough | 04 July 2013 | www.grough.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Wildlife


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky