[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Community benefit can prove divisive  

Credit:  The Courier | 5 July 2013 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

In response to the piece on community benefit and Newburgh Community Trust; Murdo Fraser is calling a spade a spade.

Community benefit is an inducement to buy support for a planning application and is one way of trying to make an unacceptable proposal acceptable.

Whether the money comes from the developer as a community benefit or to a community trust in grants to process an application for their own wind turbine or farm the public always pays one way or another.

The Newburgh Community Trust’s efforts to become a wind farmer were doomed from the outset by proceeding with an overblown project on an extremely sensitive site and the best part of £300,000 of taxpayers’ money was squandered on consultants.

That sum was in the form of a soft loan. Win planning permission and pay it back or fail and the loan is written off. The same sort of money is being “invested” by the Scottish Government on similarly daft schemes.

One is at Tillyrie near Milnathort on a site where previous applications have been refused planning permission and an appeal dismissed by a Scottish Government Reporter.

Not much joined-up thinking there, then.

And over in Argyll a similar grandiose scheme near Cove has just been recommended by planners for refusal but not before a packet of all our money has been gobbled up getting it to this stage.

Another thing that is unpleasant about community benefit is that it can be extremely divisive and divide communities rather than bringing them together.

Graham Lang.
Coaltown of Callange,
Ceres, Cupar.

Source:  The Courier | 5 July 2013 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.