LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Harbour turbine plan set for refusal 

Credit:  Buchan Observer | 25 June 2013 | www.buchanobserver.co.uk ~~

Controversial plans for the erection of two wind turbines at Peterhead harbour are being recommended for refusal by council planners.

An application from Peterhead Port Authority for the turbines aon land at Keith Inch and Green Hill at the harbour will go before members of the Buchan area committee on Tuesday, with councillors urged to reject the proposal.

Plans for the giant turbines – 99.5m in height – attracted 16 letters of objection from the local community.

In support of the application the port authority has submitted a Noise report for the specific turbine proposed, Environmental Statement, Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, and a Non-Technical Summary.

The applicants further submit that the proposed turbines will generate a significant financial return for the port and this will be directed to offset the current maintenance liability for the port in the region of £700,000 per annum.

The turbines would represent a secure income stream to meet these costs as well as improving the carbon footprint of the port. They also advise that some revenues would be directed towards the local community and are assessing whether any power generated could be diverted to supply users of the port businesses.

However, objectors claim the turbines would be detrimental to the local landscape and that Peterhead already suffers from unsightly developments, a situation which will be exacerbated by the erection of two turbines at this height.

Source:  Buchan Observer | 25 June 2013 | www.buchanobserver.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky