LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Kelly McParland: Wynne pulls the plug on $3.7 billion of wasted wind farming 

Credit:  Kelly McParland | 13/06/21 | National Post | nationalpost.com ~~

Kathleen Wynne must start every day surveying the list of messes bequeathed her by dear departed Dalton, and wondering which to address today.

Power plants. Deficits. OLG. Horse racing. Unions. How’s a premier to get any sleep when she’s still dealing with problems she didn’t even create?

Wynne has been whittling away at the list, in between doing deals with the New Democrats to keep the Liberals in office. On Thursday she put a check mark, or maybe just a third of a check mark, next to one of the most contentious items: windmills.

Dalton McGuinty loved windmills. He signed on wholesale to the idea that wind provides free energy, and that by harnessing it Ontario could save big bucks, save the planet and generate a prime place for itself among global do-gooders.

It’s been a disaster. It’s difficult to find anyone with anything good to say about the program, other than among the corporate opportunists who seized on the rich package of guarantees the government offered to anyone willing sign up for its new religion. None of the assumptions behind it has proven true. The province is paying subsidies to have windmills built, then paying through the nose for the power, then paying customers to take it off their hands. Rural Ontario is up in arms. Even the usual Liberal fan base can no longer feign enthusiasm.

So Wynne is trying to cut the losses. A few weeks ago she rescinded the no-NIMBY clause, which forced municipalities to swallow windmills whether they liked it or not. Now they’ll actually be asked for input, and projects that can’t win local support will not be looked on with enthusiasm.

On Thursday she chopped $3.7 billion off a $9.7 billion deal with Samsung. It will now buy 30% less electricity from Samsung windmills and solar projects than originally intended. This is the second time the much-herald Samsung deal has been amended downward: in 2011 the Liberals cut $327 million from promised payments to the firm, reducing the total to a maximum of $110 million.

It was presented as evidence of the government saving money for taxpayers, as was Thursday’s announcement. “This was the most significant step our province could take … to bend the cost curve for ratepayers,” Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli insisted. The opposition isn’t buying: cutting a third off the project just means Ontarians are still paying two-thirds the price of a bad deal, they noted. Even the NDP isn’t happy, despite the claim the billions being poured into wind projects are intended to create jobs.

“I think what we’ve heard is an admission that the Liberal government’s energy project has been a colossal failure,” New Democrat Jonah Schein complained. “We’ve clearly seen that sweetheart deals with private companies have not delivered good jobs, and they’ve created increased costs.”

McGuinty isn’t sticking around to see his legacy dismantled a piece at a time. Last week he resigned his seat and took himself off into retirement. Wynne was determined to say nice things about him: “He’s done enormous service to the people of Ontario and … it’s been an honour to work with him.”

Yeah, you bet. And it’s probably easier to erase his memory from voters if he’s not still sitting there watching his cookie crumble.

Source:  Kelly McParland | 13/06/21 | National Post | nationalpost.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky