[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Source: Campo tribe votes down Shu’luuk Wind  

Credit:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | June 20, 2013 | eastcountymagazine.org ~~

By a 34-44 margin, the Campo tribe’s General Council has voted against the Shu’luuk Wind project, a proposal to lease reservation land to Invenergy, according to Donna Tisdale, Chair of the Boulevard Community Planning Group. Tisdale indicated she has multiple sources on the vote outcome.

ECM has contacted the Campo Band of Mission Indians to request comment on the outcome.

The project may not be dead, however, as proponents hope to have another vote in the future.

According to Tisdale, objections included the amount of funds offered to tribal members versus administrators, as well as impacts of wind turbines on tribal members living nearby. For details on the project see http://eastcountymagazine.org/node/13372

The U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs and the U.S. Department of the Interior have not yet released the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the project.

Meanwhile a years-long battle between Infigen and Gamesa over the 2009 catastrophic failure at the Kumeyaay Wind project on the Campo reservation has been settled: http://www.nawindpower.com/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.11650;

“BIA and Dept of Interior never responded to our calls for an investigation into the cause of that failure–and those 75 highly flammable discarded turbine blades still litter the ground at the base of the turbines,” Tisdale told ECM. “There seems to be very little, if any, federal oversight on these turbine projects on federal / tribal lands–other than a few OSHA issues where workers were actually hurt on-site.”

Source:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | June 20, 2013 | eastcountymagazine.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: