[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine battle is playing out in courts 

Credit:  By Luke Edwards | Grimsby Lincoln News | 20 June 2013 | www.niagarathisweek.com ~~

In their fight against industrial turbine developments municipalities, action groups and individuals have appealed to the hand of the law.

A number of court cases have risen in Ontario in recent months, including a local battle between the Township of Wainfleet and Wainfleet Wind Energy Inc. In that case, WWE Inc. took the township to court over its 2-km setback bylaw for turbines. The bylaw, which was enacted last year, went against the Green Energy Act’s 550 metre setback and would have made it virtually impossible for turbines to be built anywhere in the township.

When the township passed the bylaw aldermen were aware of the potential of court action. Both Wainfleet staff and lawyers representing WWE Inc. and Rankin Construction, which is a partner in the project to bring five turbines to the township, warned council there could be action.

And while the WWE Inc. appeal was successful, the judge deemed Wainfleet’s setback bylaw as ‘invalid’ Wainfleet’s mayor April Jeffs still considered it worthwhile.

“I still think it (the bylaw) was the right thing to do,” she said after hearing of its defeat.

The judge sided with WWE Inc. in large part due to the township’s vague definition of property.

John Andrews, president of IPC Energy, of which WWE Inc. is a part, said he was “absolutely” more confident in their project with the decision.

“The bylaw was clearly not enforceable,” he said.

“In my opinion it was made primarily for the reason of frustrating the project.”

With the bylaw squashed, WWE Inc. is continuing to go ahead with its plans and Andrews said they expect to begin construction this summer.

But Wainfleet Ald. Betty Konc, who has been a vocal critic of the Wainfleet project and industrial turbines in general, said she considered the decision a win for turbine opponents.

“We were well within our jurisdiction. If we had a better definition of property we may have won,” she said.

That decision impacts a municipality to the west currently facing a similar court case. Plympton-Wyoming, near Sarnia, is opposing a proposal by Suncor to build 24 turbines in the town, part of a project that will see upwards of 46 turbines built in the area.

That case has yet to be decided, but the town’s mayor, Lonny Napper, remained optimistic after hearing about the Wainfleet decision.

“We’re moving forward. We think we’ve got some pretty good backup,” he said.

“We know a little more what to expect now.”

Plympton-Wyoming enacted bylaws in addition to the setback. It also passed bylaws on development charges and building fees, to make it further difficult to build turbines.

Near Strathroy, reports have surfaced that NextEra Energy is going after a local resident, Esther Wrightman. A lawsuit, filed by NextEra to the Ontario Court of Justice, said that when Wrightman changed NextEra’s logo to read “NextTerror” and “NextError” she infringed copywright, and made misleading statements meant to discredit NextEra.

That case is still up in the air, and it’s unclear what the outcome will be. NextEra has reportedly said it will donate any damages to the United Way.

Source:  By Luke Edwards | Grimsby Lincoln News | 20 June 2013 | www.niagarathisweek.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky