[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

No Windham wind decision this year  

Credit:  By MIKE FAHER / Reformer Staff | Brattleboro Reformer | June 20, 2013 | www.reformer.com ~~

WINDHAM – An international wind-power developer won’t decide this year whether a ridgeline in Windham and Grafton is suitable for commercial turbines.

A representative of Iberdrola Renewables, which has erected testing towers in the two towns, said it will be 2014 – at the earliest – before the company has enough weather data to either pursue or abandon a potential wind project here.

“We like to have a year or two of data,” Iberdrola spokesman Paul Copleman said.

Iberdrola, operating locally as Atlantic Wind LLC, last summer announced plans to build two meteorological-test (MET) towers in Windham and another in Grafton.

Those towers, erected on land owned by Meadowsend Timberland Limited, could be a precursor to Windham County’s first commercial wind farm.

Though Iberdrola representatives have stressed that they have no idea whether the area can support wind turbines, the MET towers nonetheless generated controversy.

There was organized citizen opposition in Grafton, where the Selectboard held public forums but did not formally take a position on the project.

It was a different story in Windham, where the Selectboard and planning commission argued that the state Public Service Board should deny permission to build MET towers because the town plan bans industrial wind power.

The state Department of Public Service – which is separate from the Public Service Board – sided with Windham. But the state
board nonetheless granted a certificate of public good for three MET towers late last year.

An Iberdrola executive previously had said the company might have gathered sufficient weather data sometime in 2013. But Copleman now says that won’t be the case.

“We got them up in early April, so it will be a while,” he said.

Copleman added that, “had they gone up earlier, there would have been several seasons of data,” including winter.

At this point, he said, the towers are operating but have not produced enough meaningful, long-term data on which Iberdrola can base its decision.

“We monitor all our MET towers’ data output on a regular basis, in part to learn about the performance of the wind in regular intervals but also to confirm the MET tower equipment is recording and sending us data,” Copleman said.

He also said there had been no complications during installation of the towers. Atlantic Wind had argued that the MET towers would be minimally obtrusive, as they stand less than 200 feet tall, are held in place by guy lines, require no foundations and are not lit.

“There’s no heavy equipment,” Copleman said. “The parts and equipment come in on a pickup truck.”

If the company at some point pursues a turbine project on the ridge, Atlantic Wind would have to again seek state permits.

Windham County state Sen. Peter Galbraith, a Townshend Democrat, in April introduced a bill that would block such a project. The legislation says the Public Service Board could approve wind turbines in Windham only if the structures comply with the town plan.

That bill was referred to the Senate Finance Committee. But it went no further before the 2013 legislative session ended in May.

Source:  By MIKE FAHER / Reformer Staff | Brattleboro Reformer | June 20, 2013 | www.reformer.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.