News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind turbines get all clear  

Credit:  Cimara Pearce | The Weekly Times | June 6, 2013 | www.weeklytimesnow.com.au ~~

Wind turbines have no link with a disease caused by low frequency noise despite some anti-wind farm groups declaring so.

University of Sydney Professor Simon Chapman said claims vibroacoustic disease was caused by wind turbines was based on a “flimsy case report” of one boy whose only symptom was poor concentration at school.

Prof Chapman and colleague Alexis St George used web and database searches to examine how wind farms became linked with the disease.

“A total of 35 research papers was found on vibroacoustic disease,” he said. [See, e.g.:  http://wndfo.net/vad]

“Of these, all but one had a first author from the same research group and none of the papers contained any reference to wind turbines.

“Wind turbines have the potential to make major contributions to renewable energy generation and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and authorities should … examine the quality of evidence that claims they harm health.

“Vibroacoustic disease is not … recognised by almost anyone other than the tiny, self-citing research group from Portugal, and the echo chamber of anti-wind farm groups who are desperate to grab hold of any disease and claim it as theirs.”

Prof Chapman released a report in March that said only one in every 272 residents living within 5km of a wind farm ever made a complaint, but Waubra wind farm chief executive Sarah Laurie said at the time Prof Chapman’s data was flawed. [See:  http://wndfo.net/nocebo]

Victorian Farmers Federation president Peter Tuohey said wind farms were a contentious issue and could be divisive for VFF members.

Some members had wind farms on their properties and didn’t have a problem with them but some other members who lived near turbines could complain of health effects.

“We haven’t got a policy on it,” Mr Tuohey said.

“There hasn’t been enough people trying to drive it through the VFF to say we don’t want wind farms, so I’d say that means the number of complaints are small.”

He said he would support an independent, comprehensive study into possible wind farm-related health effects.

Source:  Cimara Pearce | The Weekly Times | June 6, 2013 | www.weeklytimesnow.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.