[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge invalidates ballots leaving Board of Health election a tie DeTerra leaning toward appeal 

Credit:  By Peggy Aulisio, Editor | June 06, 2013 | www.southcoasttoday.com ~~

FAIRHAVEN – Two contested ballots in the Board of Health race were disqualified by Judge Robert J. Kane at a hearing in New Bedford Superior Court on June 3.

One ballot was called for Peter DeTerra at a recount in late April, giving him a one-vote margin of victory over John Wethington. But Judge Kane said it wasn’t clear what the intent of the voter was. By disqualifying that vote, the Board of Health race became a tie.

On Tuesday, Mr. DeTerra said he is going to appeal. While the appeal is pending, a seat on a crucial board is left up in the air as it heads into a meeting on the wind turbines next Monday.

Explaining his decision to appeal, Mr. DeTerra said, “The Board of Registrars went by the intent of the voter, and Judge Kane didn’t go by the intent of the voter. He threw out a person’s vote. It was clearly by my name.”

Mr. Wethington’s attorney, Ann DeNardis, called for holding a new election June 25, to coincide with the special election for the U.S. Senate seat held by John Kerry. But Judge Kane refused to call for a new election, leaving that up to the town.

Because Mr. Markey wasn’t sure in court Monday if Mr. DeTerra would appeal, the judge asked Ms. DeNardis to proceed with calling witnesses. The witnesses were called to address her challenge on other factors, like the way ballots were handled by the town clerk, Eileen Lowney, in the days after the April 1 election.

Ms. DeNardis first called Mark Curtis of ABC6 in Providence who had done a news segment showing unsecured ballots in Ms. Lowney’s office the day after the election. Mr. Curtis said Ms. Lowney held ballots and allowed him to film ballots kept in insecured boxes and envelopes.

Mr. Markey asked Mr. Curtis about his “colleague” who works at the station, John Methia, who is active in Windwise. Mr. Methia has been very outspoken against the wind turbines. He also served Mr. Wethington’s interests as an official observer during the recount on April 22.

Mr. Curtis said he knew Mr. Methia, but was unaware of his participation as an observer in the recount.

The Windwise connection is a key element of the race with Mr. Wethington the preferred candidate of that group. Ms. DeNardis has also represented Windwise members in legal action against the town.

Under questioning by Ms. DeNardis, Ms. Lowney acknowledged she continued to count ballots after declaring Mr. Wethington the winner on election night, which is contrary to state law.

After counting some ballots in a write-in envelopes, Ms. Lowney reversed her earlier declaration on election night and declared Mr. DeTerra the winner by a small margin.

Very few people were left then at Town Hall and Ms. Lowney acknowledged that she allowed Executive Secretary Jeffrey Osuch to count the ballots with her. Ms. Lowney also admitted to other election irregularities under questioning.

The other vote the judge invalidated had not been accepted by the Registrars, but Ms. DeNardis wanted it called for Mr. Wethington. If it had been, he would have won the election.

Explaining his decision to invalidate a vote the Registrars called for Mr. DeTerra, Judge Kane said it had “a peculiar and confusing shape” next to the circle by the candidate’s name, but no markings within the circle.

Judge Kane said it looked like “a scribble over another marking” that conveys “a mixture of intentions.” He added, “The scribbling provides a reason to believe a cross out rather than an affirmative signal.”

Judge Kane listened intently to the witnesses and asked several questions. He asked to see the tapes the voting machines printed out showing the vote talleys at the town’s six precincts.

The judge continued the hearing for next Monday, June 10, from 2 to 4 p.m. The Board of Health has scheduled a meeting for noon that same day to discuss the state Department of Environmental Protection’s preliminary report on the two wind turbines on town land.

It was not clear on Monday whether Mr. DeTerra would be able to attend that meeting or whether he would be able to attend meetings of the Board of Health until the disputed election is resolved. It was also unclear whether any votes he cast at recent meetings would be invalidated.

Source:  By Peggy Aulisio, Editor | June 06, 2013 | www.southcoasttoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky