[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

St. Clair not a willing host for turbines  

Credit:  By Heather Young | Thursday, May 23, 2013 | www.sarniathisweek.com ~~

St. Clair Township is not a willing host for wind turbines.

That’s the declaration councillors made – unanimously – after a recent discussion to establish a by-law about where they can be placed within the municipality.

Deputy Clerk and Coordinator of Planning Jeff Baranek made a presentation to council suggesting it adopt a by-law to establish building permit fees for industrial wind turbines.

“You can’t make revenue off building permit fees,” he said, “but you can ensure all costs… are harboured by the developer.”

Baranek’s suggestion was a $10,000 fee per turbine plus $100 per metre to the highest point of the structure. He mentioned that some municipalities – most notably Bluewater – are issuing other fees, like a $220,000 decommissioning fee by that municipality, but such a cost was not among his recommendations.

He did, however, suggest that council adopt a two-kilometre setback from any property line, which he said would essentially “sterilize” the township.

There would be a clause to allow the reduction of setbacks with appropriate scientific evidence.

“I’m not encouraging these things, I just want to make sure it’s in the by-laws,” said Deputy Mayor Peter Gilliland after agreeing to Baranek’s recommendations.

Still, Jim DeGurse wondered whether the move made it look like the township was willing to receive turbines.

Immediately after councillors voted in favour of the amended by-law, Councillor Jeff Agar made a new motion – that St. Clair Township is “not interested in being a willing host to (industrial wind turbines).”

The motion was passed without discussion.

Source:  By Heather Young | Thursday, May 23, 2013 | www.sarniathisweek.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.