| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Anti-wind group accuses Clayton town board of canceling meetings because of video cameras
Credit: By JAEGUN LEE, TIMES STAFF WRITER | THURSDAY, MAY 23, 2013 | www.ogd.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
CLAYTON – A relatively new anti-wind organization is accusing the Town Council of canceling two scheduled meetings because the group started hiring Steve Weed Productions, Watertown, to videotape these open sessions.
However, Town Supervisor Justin A. Taylor said that this is far from the truth and that the April 24 and May 22 council workshop meetings were canceled simply because of a lack of agenda items.
“This is the second meeting that was canceled because of Steve Weed,” said Cindy L. Grant, a member of Concerned Citizens for Open and Transparent Government. “I don’t think Justin Taylor likes the cameras.”
She said the group consists of local and seasonal residents of Clayton, Orleans, Brownville, Lyme and Cape Vincent who do not want to live near a wind farm and have their “skyline view disturbed by ugly wind turbines.”
So far, she said, members have raised more than $1,000 to have the Clayton town board meetings videotaped and posted online.
Mrs. Grant has been suggesting that Mr. Taylor is secretly working for wind developer Iberdrola Renewables to help the company with its Horse Creek Wind Farm proposal.
“He’s done everything he could to promote this project,” she said.
Earlier this month, however, Clayton council members defended Mr. Taylor, arguing that a few people in the community have been spreading “disinformation” and that the town supervisor is “doing nothing underhanded” – especially not on their watch.
“I don’t mind having Steve Weed at our meetings at all, because in Clayton, we run an open and transparent government,” Mr. Taylor said Wednesday. “We have canceled workshop meetings in the past because of a lack of agenda items. This is very typical in Clayton.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=37254 ]
