[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Blowing smoke  

Credit:  The Scotsman | 21 May 2013 | www.scotsman.com ~~

After reading the letter
(13 May) from Niall Stuart of Scottish Renewables, whose membership includes wind farm developers, I thought he was protesting far too much. Mr Stuart, along with the rest of the wind industry, is painfully aware that excessively subsidised wind energy is losing public and political support. He tries, unsuccessfully, to defend the indefensible.

His rose-tinted look at wind energy and what other countries are embracing fails to report that Germany has realised the inability of wind to deliver a ­reliable energy source, despite its many turbines, and has turned to constructing 29 new coal-fired power stations to keep the lights on.

A recent Freedom of Information request to the Scottish Government revealed what was not taken into account in the calculations of carbon dioxide (CO2) savings from wind power.

These included the grid connection (pylons, poles, cables, supply and installation), turbine parts from overseas – including extraction, processing of rare earth minerals and manufacture of carbon fibre for the turbine blades – decommissioning (and all that entails and if concrete bases and infrastructure were to be removed), employment of foreign workers and equipment from abroad and their transportation and costs over and above those expected from local ­workers.

The official response was that these “embedded emissions are not typically counted and nor are they for any other form of generation, so to do so would be misleading”.

What is misleading is the fact that wind power (which we subsidise through our energy bills) is sold to us as “clean and green” and that it saves CO2 emissions – other conventional forms of generation do not make such absurd claims, so the same rules for CO2 calculations should not apply. Without doubt, if all the ­relevant issues, including those listed here, were factored into the wind power CO2 calculations we would be lucky to see any displacement at all.

Come clean, wind industry, because the energy source you promote surely can’t.

L Ward



Source:  The Scotsman | 21 May 2013 | www.scotsman.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.