LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine would adversely affect Stithains Church, says Cornwall Council 

Credit:  May 20, 2013 | www.thisiscornwall.co.uk ~~

Cornwall Council has refused permission for a 62m wind turbine on farmland at Stithians.

London-based Windberry energy Ltd wanted to build the turbine, with associated infrastructure and access track, at Pencoose Farm.

When the plans first came to light more than a year ago, local people set up an action group to fight the proposal.

They claimed the structure would be “the height of Truro Cathedral” and “a blot on the landscape”.

It would be visible across the entire village, would adversely affect property prices and have a bad impact on the tourist trade.

Cornwall Council’s planning department received 71 letters of objection and five of support.

Both Gwennap and Stithians parish councils refused to support the application.

The planning application was due to be considered by the west sub-area planning committee on June 3, but was turned down this week under delegated powers.

Planning officers concluded: “The proposed development, by virtue of its size, scale and location, would have a significant adverse landscape and visual impact, including an adverse impact on the setting of the Church of St Stedian which is a Grade II Listed Building, in addition to dominating and adversely affecting the local landscape and the setting of the adjacent Area of Great Landscape Value and adding to the existing impact of tall, man-made structures.”

Cornwall councillor Mark Kaczmarek, who represents Carharrack and Gwennap, said: “Following my discussions with planning officers dealing with the case, it will not now go to the West Area planning committee on June 3.

“It has, I am pleased to say, been refused under delegated powers.

“I have also asked for a letter to be sent out informing all of those who had taken the time to write in to object or support the application just in case they were going to attend the meeting.”

Source:  May 20, 2013 | www.thisiscornwall.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky