LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Champaign wind farm decision nears; State board will consider second phase of turbine project 

Credit:  By Matt Sanctis, Staff Writer | Springfield News-Sun | May 19, 2013 | www.springfieldnewssun.com ~~

URBANA – The Ohio Power Siting Board may decide this month whether the second phase of the Buckeye Wind Project will move forward after more than a year of debate and rising tensions between some Champaign County neighbors and the company in charge of the project.

It would include construction of 56 wind turbines across 13,500 acres of land in Champaign County, if siting board members approve the plan. The second phase alone could have an estimated $55 million impact on the region and provide about $20 million in payments to local townships and schools over the life of the project, according to developers.

Combined with an earlier first phase that has already been approved, the plan would could mean a total of more than 100 turbines across the area.

Opponents, including some residents living in the project’s footprint, have questioned the economic benefits and raised concerns that the turbines are too close to homes. The controversial issue has pitted neighbors against each other and led to debates about property values, noise and safety.

The project is the only item listed on the siting board’s May 28 agenda.

The siting board has several options, said Matt Butler, a spokesman. The board can either approve the project as proposed, deny it altogether or require changes to the plan before it can move forward.

Regardless of the decision, an appeal is likely from at least one of the parties involved, said Chris Walker, an attorney representing Union Neighbors United. The group is made up of local residents opposed to the wind project.

“I would say it’s likely that someone’s going to file for a rehearing,” Walker said.

Once the state board members make the initial decision, both sides have the right to file for a rehearing within 30 days. If the parties involved are not satisfied with the result of the rehearing, they also have an additional 60 days to appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court.

During the first phase of the project,the siting board decision was appealed in April 2010, and the board affirmed its original decision in July that year. The case was appealed to the state supreme court, which ultimately decided in March last year that the project’s first phase would be allowed to move forward.

Although a ruling was expected earlier this spring, Jason Dagger, a spokesman for the project, said construction could still begin later this year if the siting board approves the proposal.

Several issues are still pending, including how the project will be taxed. Developers are expected to seek a Payment In Lieu of Taxes, or PILOT, if the project moves forward. Under that scenario, Buckeye would make an annual payment to the county between $1.2 and $1.8 million spread between numerous entities, including schools, libraries, townships and other organizations. The payments would be made over the life of the project, or about 20 years.

However, the Champaign County commissioners, who would have to approve PILOT payments, have not taken a stance on the issue. If the PILOT request is not approved, the project would be taxed like a traditional utility, a scenario project developers have previously said would make it difficult for the project to remain competitive.

A dispute is also pending before the siting board over proposed changes to a staging area that would be used to store construction materials at the intersection of U.S. 36 and Three-Mile Road. The city of Urbana has raised concerns that the site is near a sewer line extension to Robert Rothschild Farm. Earlier this year, the city and county reached an agreement with Rothschild Farm to extend the sewer line, allowing the company to move ahead with an expansion that would include hiring 25 new full-time employees.

City officials have complained that Buckeye should not be allowed to move the construction yard to that site, but Dagger said the issue should have no effect on whether the project ultimately moves forward.

Dagger said Buckeye would work with the city and county to ensure the sewer line is not damaged.

Dagger said the company is also continuing to research a handful of potential turbines that could be used for the project, based on the cost and best technology available.

“We feel that we’ve got a good project, and we’re ready to move forward,” Dagger said.

Source:  By Matt Sanctis, Staff Writer | Springfield News-Sun | May 19, 2013 | www.springfieldnewssun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky