LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Fewer holiday makers in Carrick 

Credit:  May 16 2013 by Edwin Lawrence | Ayrshire Post | www.ayrshirepost.net ~~

Fewer and fewer people are coming to holiday cottages in the beautiful Stinchar Valley.

And a main factor is the spread of wind turbines in South Carrick.

That’s what a rural resident told a South Ayrshire Council planning committee.

William Hair said: “Bookings are few and far between for holiday cottages – a marked contrast with years past.”

Mr Hair is one of 17 objectors to a solo turbine going up at Little Pinmore Farm.

It would be 60 metres high to the hub, and 84 metres to the blade tip.

But the council is not in a position to decide on a plan by power company E-Gen.

For the company is making an appeal to the Scottish Government citing the council’s ‘failure to give a decision’ – deemed to be a refusal.

But the council is still able to make ‘a statement of observations’ to the government.

And councillors and planners are backing the rural folk who say it would be a blight on their lives.

Senior planner Austin Cooke said the turbine would be in a scenic area very close ‘to an intimate pastoral valley’.

And he showed slides showing nearby major wind farms at Arecleoch and Mark Hill.

Planning committee chairman Peter Convery spoke of the council’s duty as ‘custodians of these areas’.

Councillor Nan McFarlane said the council was not against wind turbines ‘in the right place’ – ‘but not spoiling a scenic landscape’.

Councillors backed their planners’ recommendation to ask the Scottish Government Reporter to dismiss the appeal.

Grounds include the turbine’s visual impact on an environment that already features solo turbines and major wind farms. Also the impact on a ‘sensitive landscape’ which is listed as a ‘regionally significant tourist resource’.

Source:  May 16 2013 by Edwin Lawrence | Ayrshire Post | www.ayrshirepost.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky