LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Special counsel to fight proposed wind turbines 

Credit:  By DAVID PEPIN / Sun Staff Writer | The Westerly Sun | May 14, 2013 | www.thewesterlysun.com ~~

CHARLESTOWN – The Town Council may not have any legal cards left to play in its fight against two proposed wind turbines, but it will not walk away from the table.

The council voted unanimously Monday night to authorize Town Administrator Mark Stankiewicz to hire a special counsel to represent the town at the May 21 Zoning Board of Review hearing at which Whalerock Renewable Energy LLC will seeking a special use permit to build the turbines on a site north of Route 1 between King’s Factory Road and East Quail Run. The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. at Charlestown Elementary School.

The motion presented by council President Thomas Gentz allows the town to spend up to $50,000 to hire the special counsel and arrange for any appropriate experts to provide testimony at the hearing.

“We’ll start at 9 a.m.” today, Gentz said, adding that “it won’t be hard” to put together its case in time for the hearing.

The council discussed the move in executive session before Monday’s monthly meeting, then took the vote immediately after returning from deliberations. The move was prompted by a state Superior Court decision on April 10 that dismissed suits brought by the council and a group of residents living near the site who tried to slow or halt the regulatory process.

Gentz said the council was advised by Town Solicitor Peter Ruggiero that the decision of Superior Court Associate Justice Kristin Rodgers eliminated any legal options the town had remaining. The ruling supported local developer Lawrence LeBlanc’s quest to build the wind energy project .

“It was really the judge that put the town against the wall. When she remanded back to the zoning board, she said the town could not appeal,” Gentz said.

“We felt a special counsel was necessary, and can bring a lot of testimony about the impacts of industrial turbines on the town.”

Neither Gentz, elected to the council in 2010, nor Ruggiero, solicitor the past eight years, could recall a previous instance of Charlestown hiring a special counsel. Ruggiero said he would still participate in the hearing on behalf of the town.

LeBlanc proposed the turbines in 2009 after failing to win approval for affordable housing at the site. He has been fighting the town since an anti-turbine majority was elected to the council in 2010 and imposed a moratorium on wind power plants. LeBlanc argued that his application to the zoning board was substantially completed, though an interim town planner ruled otherwise in 2010, and that his plans only needed an advisory opinion from the Planning Commission, not its outright approval.

Rodgers’ decision ruled that a previous appearance LeBlanc had made before the commission satisfied the advisory requirement, and that the council and the residents’ group had not offered substantial reason to deny him a hearing.

Under town ordinance, a wind turbine plant can only be granted under a special use permit, to be granted by the zoning board.

Source:  By DAVID PEPIN / Sun Staff Writer | The Westerly Sun | May 14, 2013 | www.thewesterlysun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon