[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Opposition to wind farm increases  

Credit:  Opposition to wind farm increases; Will the setback distance also increase? Written by Seth Slabaugh | The Star Press | May 12, 2013 | www.thestarpress.com ~~

SELMA – Opposition to a possible wind farm in Delaware County is growing.

An overflow crowd of about 75 people showed up at a city-county plan commission meeting on May 2 to voice objections to a potential wind farm.

The opponents then conducted a meeting of their own last week attended by about 125 people.

One of the organizers, Kathy Gresh, a hospital office worker, told The Star Press many Delaware County residents still “don’t know anything about this.”

“We’re still trying to get the word out to everybody,” Gresh said.

While many Indiana counties have adopted zoning ordinances requiring a setback of at least 1,000 feet between a commercial wind turbine and a residential dwelling unit, “we are asking for a minimum setback of two miles,” Gresh said.

That’s 10,560 feet.

“Our rural population in Delaware County is so much greater than in other counties,” Gresh said. “It’s more like a city in the rural area of Delaware County. We’re just too populated (for a wind farm). No one is opposed to green energy. That’s not our dispute. But there’s a place for these, and it’s not in the middle of our neighborhoods.”

The plan commission is considering a zoning amendment that would permit wind farms in farming zones and also establish regulations, including setback distances between wind turbines and residences.

During the May 2 meeting, plan commission director Marta Moody proposed a setback distance of 1,320 feet, based on the research findings of a committee named by the commission to study the issue.

But based on opposition, the commission voted to postpone action on the ordinance at least until its June 6 meeting.

Opponents want to host another meeting before the scheduled June 6 meeting.

“Our next step is to publicly invite the county commissioners and the plan commission to a meeting to answer some questions we still don’t have answers to,” Gresh said. “And to hear more of our concerns before they vote on the 6th.”

Wind farm developer E.ON Climate & Renewables has leased thousands of acres in Delaware County for a possible wind farm. Officials from the company have made a presentation to a property tax abatement committee of county government. They also attended the plan commission’s last meeting.

Among the opponents’ concerns: noise, property values, fragments of blades breaking up in high winds and being thrown toward residences and ice being thrown from blades.

Source:  Opposition to wind farm increases; Will the setback distance also increase? Written by Seth Slabaugh | The Star Press | May 12, 2013 | www.thestarpress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.