[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Fiscal fibbing and inciting Falmouth voters  

Credit:  Mark Cool | Posted on May 13, 2013 | falmouth.patch.com ~~

Who’s telling the truth and who’s crying “Fire”?

The two groups (‘Healers’ and ‘Friends’) are in final throws of a controversial campaign over question 2.

Why the alleged $25 million cost from the ‘Friends”? That’s a far cry from $14 million. The ‘Friends’ likely derive this figure from the projected revenue gain, that could otherwise be lost, if turbines were to operate without restrictions for the next 18 years.

Projecting a financial outcome is certainly necessary. But $25 million? I think it more essential that the gathering of the most accurate and reliable data should account for the projection.

The Falmouth Wind Turbine Options Process report concluded that if the turbines were to operate for the next 18 years in the 12 on – 12 off operational regiment, the end result would be an $8 million deficit. Interjecting this data into a projection, after all, is reasonable and rational given that Falmouth’s Health Board is on record stating residents will never be allowed less than an acceptable period of night sleep.

The ‘Friends’ however, provide a figure that neglects this “known.” The $25 million projection is fragrantly being used to incite and mislead voters. The projection is far from accurate, and is fearfully unreliable. There is nothing “known” that supports their claim that turbine removal will cost $25 million, let alone be operated with wild abandon 24/7. Especially given the recent nuisance judgement made by Falmouth’s Zoning Board of Appeals.

If the ‘Friends’ campaign touts a “sky is falling” platform, they license the ‘Healers’ to do the same. ‘Healers’ could easily have claimed that the cost to keep the turbines could result in the town’s purchase of at least 40 properties within 1/3 of a mile from the turbines. That would cost a minimum of $17 million and could reasonably rise to be in excess of $25 million if legal expenses, property management fees, insurance and loss of tax revenue (to itemize only a few) were to be included.

The ‘Healer’s’ campaign is based upon what’s known to be true. The Selectmen’s stated cost is what’s known to be true. The true tabulation to remove the turbines has accurately been determined and presented to the voter. Don’t let recklessly bad information set fire to reason.

Please – Vote Yes on 2.

Source:  Mark Cool | Posted on May 13, 2013 | falmouth.patch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.