[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Foes and issues clearly point to petition denial; Project means noise, shadow flicker, reduced property values  

Credit:  By Steve Robery Franklin Grove | Created: Saturday, May 11, 2013 | www.saukvalley.com ~~

Lee County Board Chairman Rick Ketchum says he will vote against the zoning board’s recommendation to reject the special use application for a 50-turbine wind farm in southwestern Lee County.

The zoning board met more than 30 times over the course of 10 months and heard testimony from both sides of the issue before members came to their conclusion to reject the petition. Mr. Ketchum attended one, maybe two, of those meetings and somehow thinks he knows better.

Over the last several years, many people in Lee County have become educated with regard to the impacts of industrial wind farms. Most of the zoning board members are among that group. Mr. Ketchum is not.

The evidence presented during the 10-month hearing overwhelmingly indicates that under the conditions proposed by the applicant, the special use would not be compatible with the existing land uses and would threaten the health, safety and welfare of those forced to live near the turbines.

I believe I speak for the concerned citizens of Lee County by demanding that Mr. Ketchum, and any other County Board members who vote against the zoning board’s decision, provide a detailed account that justifies their positions.

Their positions should be based on facts, not unsupported statements such as the one Mr. Ketchum was recently quoted saying, “The foes of the wind farm were the minority.” “Foes” of the wind farm outnumbered proponents 10-1 during the hearings.

In general, only three property owners who stand to make a bunch of money showed up in support of the project. A community survey confirms that the overwhelming percentage of informed individuals do not support the project under the conditions proposed by the applicant.

County Board member Marvin Williams was quoted as saying that he had no problem with wind turbines as long as they don’t infringe on neighbors’ rights. Mr. Williams, please read the hearing transcripts. They do, in fact, infringe on neighbor’s rights: noise, shadow flicker, aviation lights, property value reductions, etc.

Wind farm proponents need to stop dismissing the negative impacts and trying to justify this intrusion by saying it will provide tax revenue and jobs.

If that is how you think, let’s float gambling boats down the Rock River, legalize prostitution, legalize marijuana and other drugs, and tax the heck out of all of it. That will create jobs and tons of revenue, and we don’t care about the negative impacts. Right?

Some may argue that the zoning board vote was only 3-2 to deny the petition, so it’s not really a stretch to overturn it. Consider, however, the unanimous votes on the following Findings of Fact: the project will impact the rural character; shadow flicker has not been adequately mitigated; shadow flicker will be a nuisance; noise limits will be exceeded at some property lines; turbine operation will impact the health and welfare of some people; and property values could be negatively impacted.

When you look at all of the issues, the only reasonable conclusion is to deny the petition.

Note to readers – Steve Robery is a licensed professional engineer. He and his wife live in rural Franklin Grove.

Source:  By Steve Robery Franklin Grove | Created: Saturday, May 11, 2013 | www.saukvalley.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.