[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Energy bill burdens taxpayers  

Credit:  Written by Rep. Tama Theis, St. Cloud | St. Cloud Times | May 11, 2013 | www.sctimes.com ~~

The Minnesota House passed a billion-dollar energy rate increase for Minnesota homeowners and businesses Tuesday after multiple efforts by members of both parties to stop it.

Many outside environmental groups want Minnesota to become like other states and nations that exercise government control over power producers; this helped push the House DFLers to pass HF 956, the energy omnibus bill. The bill will require 40 percent of energy produced by investor-owned utilities, such as Xcel Energy, to come from renewable sources by 2030.

Minnesota already is working hard to meet a renewable standard passed in 2007, which was controversial because it forces utilities to take on expensive wind turbine construction, causing higher energy prices. This latest bill doubles down on this central control theory toward energy and erodes our free market system even further. Small businesses, such as the one I own and operate with my husband, will see a direct hit to our bottom line.

Xcel has predicted it could cost $1 billion to construct the 1000 megawatts of solar panels required to comply with the new law. Those costs, along with other additional infrastructure, planning, operation and maintenance costs, will be passed on to ratepayers.

More alarming, this legislation forces companies such as Xcel to utilize millions of dollars in solar panels to meet a mandate of solar energy use by 2025. Using New Jersey as a so-called role model, the bill will set up a mechanism for paying citizens to put panels on their roofs and “sell” solar energy back to the utility company.

Opening up individual solar metering pits Minnesotans against Minnesotans. A person who has a south-facing house unobstructed by trees, or a wealthy commercial building owner, may take advantage of the opportunities to generate power subsidized by their neighbors who can’t afford the initial investment or otherwise aren’t in a position to install solar.

Panels could cost $60,000 to place on a home and often require good credit with financing. But solar can cost three to 10 times more than wind to produce and is reliable only about 20 percent of the time. It may be the biggest gamble Minnesota’s lawmakers have taken with your energy bills in a very long time.

This bill creates an uneven playing field by making investor-owned utilities play by a more stringent set of rules than cooperative associations and municipal power agencies. Residents and businesses could end up paying significantly different rates in neighboring cities, or even across the street in the same city.

Finally, I was disappointed to see the House majority “carve out” certain provisions so the bill’s damaging effects wouldn’t touch some parts of the state. One provision uses your money to “incentivize” investors to buy solar panels only from Minnesota companies. (There are only two companies that make these in the state.)

If someone in St. Cloud wants to put up panels on their roof, they should have access to all vendors equally, including local companies, with open competition. Low-income ratepayers will pay more for the same electricity to support the politically connected groups that are given a government-guaranteed market. The bill picks winners and losers, and the losers are unfortunately most Minnesotans.

Arbitrary renewable energy standards come with a cost to the hardworking taxpayers of Minnesota. Picking winners and losers when it comes to energy means higher utility bills for Minnesotans. It will make energy more expensive and less reliable by putting a minimum mandate on unproven and still-developing renewable energy technologies.

Source:  Written by Rep. Tama Theis, St. Cloud | St. Cloud Times | May 11, 2013 | www.sctimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter