[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

LePage wants wind energy goals out of Maine law  

Credit:  By Matthew Stone, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Posted May 09, 2013 | bangordailynews.com ~~

AUGUSTA, Maine – Gov. Paul LePage wants to strip from state law goals for increasing the state’s wind energy capacity over the next two decades.

LePage’s energy director, Patrick Woodcock, made recommendations Thursday to rewrite the state’s 2008 Wind Energy Act, shifting focus from growing wind energy capacity to lowering electricity costs and making sure Maine sees an economic return on its wind energy investments.

The Maine Wind Energy Act, a priority of LePage’s predecessor, Democratic Gov. John Baldacci, sought to expedite wind energy development in Maine. The law zoned much of Maine’s Unorganized Territory as suitable for wind development and set goals for the state to have 2,000 megawatts of wind energy capacity by 2015, 3,000 by 2020 and 8,000 by 2030.

Maine’s wind energy capacity today is about 435 megawatts, according to the Maine Renewable Energy Association.

“We are not going to be meeting that goal,” Woodcock said of the 2,000-megawatt threshold by 2015. “I think that it’s an unrealistic goal, and there should be consideration beyond that of whether megawatt capacity installed is really the best metric of our wind energy policies.”

The recommendation from Woodcock to the Legislature’s Energy and Utilities Committee came the same day the Energy Committee heard testimony on a number of bills meant to roll back portions of the 2008 wind energy law, including one measure to temporarily suspend permitting for certain wind developments and another that would eliminate the same wind energy goals LePage favors eliminating. Both of those measures are sponsored by Democrats.

“The intention of our wind energy act was not only to increase wind energy, but to lower electricity costs,” Woodcock said. Rather than setting energy capacity goals, he said, “I believe we should have longer-term goals for electricity prices and for employment in the industry and, ultimately, that Maine is getting value from wind energy.”

LePage has long been critical of state laws he sees as favoring wind energy development and he has blamed wind energy for inflating Maine’s energy prices. However, LePage hopes to use the Maine Wind Energy Act as a model for a plan to fast-track the expansion of natural gas infrastructure in the state.

Woodcock said Thursday the Wind Energy Act needs a comprehensive review so it’s oriented toward ultimately lowering Maine’s electricity costs and fostering new energy-generation industries within the state.

“The intent of growing a wind energy industry in Maine was not just megawatt capacity installed,” he said. “If all these machines are being constructed in another country, I don’t think that’s consistent with the intent of the Legislature. If it’s not lowering energy costs, that’s not the intent of the Legislature.”

The goals for the state to grow its wind energy generation capacity aren’t binding, and erasing them from state law could send a message to potential investors that Maine isn’t interested in wind energy investments, said Jeremy Payne, executive director of the Maine Renewable Energy Association.

“What it does is send a strong business signal to investors considering developing wind projects in the Northeast: Maine has aggressive wind power goals,” Payne said.

To add energy price reduction goals to state law wouldn’t be inconsistent with the Maine Wind Energy Act, Payne said. In fact, wind should help Maine diversify its energy mix so it’s less sensitive to energy price swings, he said.

“It’s an inflation-proof fuel,” he said.

Rep. Deane Rykerson, D-Kittery, questioned Woodcock on the singular focus on lowering energy costs.

“The single metric that you use really is, how much does it cost for electricity?” he told Woodcock. “I’m wondering if you ever do consider or plan to consider any other metrics, such as clean air, job creation and greenhouse gas production.”

“I would say the current goals do a poor job of assessing those goals as well,” Woodcock said.

Source:  By Matthew Stone, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Posted May 09, 2013 | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.