[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Zoning board ruled on the evidence; so should county  

Credit:  By Bob Logan, Franklin Grove | May 4, 2013 | www.saukvalley.com ~~

The Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals made a courageous, well-founded decision to recommend denial of Green River Wind Farm’s petition for special use permit on 5,491.3 acres of Lee County prime and nearly prime farmland in the heart of an identified environmental corridor.

An honest person’s search of 3,341 transcript pages covering 27 sessions of public hearings, and anyone familiar with the 125 exhibits entered as evidence, referenced in the findings of fact, could draw no other conclusion.

If approved, the wind farm would deliver turbine impacts to 196 non-participating residences and only 23 participants. Objector petitions representing more than 170 project area landowners and 13,000 acres were filed against this project.

Exhibit 79 alone delivered more than 20 expert studies describing ill effects of turbines on human health. Exhibit 1, the petition, acknowledges nine specific requirements of Lee County’s ordinance would be met before or during the hearing. It is well documented that numerous requirements were not met.

Exhibits reflect, from the beginning, wind farms in Lee County have been given a pass on county-required LESA scoring used to deny building permits for family homes on prime farmland. The code says “all” special use permits on Ag-1 property require a LESA score. Some draw close associations between wind farms and agriculture, not knowing statutes require agricultural permits to be issued free of charge.

Exhibit 67 drew the ZBA’s attention to 415 ILCS 5/23-25 defining and prohibiting noise pollution beyond property lines, while the petitioner insisted on measuring sound impacts at residence foundations. In 415, the Illinois General Assembly incorporated its findings that excessive noise endangers physical and emotional health and well-being, depresses property values, creates public nuisances, and reduces quality of life.

The statutory purpose of zoning is to protect people from uses threatening all of the above. County board bullies with personal agendas, go ahead, attack the decision recommended by the ZBA. But first, please, examine a few transcripts of cross examination, and the exhibits not offered by the petitioner, and remember why you have a ZBA.

Take a look at the touted economic benefits to the county that fail to mention the taxpayer-subsidized cost of wind energy jobs at between $1 million and $8 million each. Take a look at the long-term burden of tax costs shifted to Lee County’s property owners when depreciable turbines lose their assessed value. Guess who makes up the difference. We do.

You’ve accepted without question recommendations to approve and place turbines where you had not been given authority to site them. What’s different now?

This recommendation, at least, agrees with the weight of the evidence presented.

Where were you when it was being presented? You’d certainly have a better understanding if you had been there.

To those county board members offended by a recent reference to Rita Crundwell, I fear she did not have a corner on the market of taxpayer abuse, and I assume they didn’t let her take her share with her.

Note to readers – Bob Logan is the former village president of Franklin Grove.

Source:  By Bob Logan, Franklin Grove | May 4, 2013 | www.saukvalley.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.