News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

House passes bill that started as wind moratorium  

Credit:  By Kirk Carapezza | Vermont Public Radio | April 26, 2013 | vpr.net ~~

The Vermont House overwhelmingly passed on Friday a bill that was originally proposed as a moratorium on ridgeline wind development in Vermont. Over the past two months, though, the bill was reduced to a study of how the state approves renewable energy projects.

The House voted 140-to-3 to approve the Senate bill.

On Friday, Natural Resources and Energy Chairman Tony Klein, D-East Montpelier, who has emerged as a lightning rod for opponents hoping to strike down wind projects, rose to passionately acknowledge that the beleaguered bill has taken a circuitous route to the House floor. Klein, a product of the 1960s, quoted the Grateful Dead.

“What a long, strange trip this has been,” said Klein, whose committee found that the kind of research called for in the Senate bill would be nearly impossible – and too expensive – to conduct.

“Some of the asks that were sent to us in the Senate bill was on research that, quite frankly, hasn’t been done anywhere yet,” Klein told his colleagues, pointing to real estate values that may or may not be affected by energy generation plants as one example.

“To really get some sort of baseline of understanding, you’ve got to go to a community where a project has been built – and remember that we’ve only had recently two projects built in the last few years – and you’ve got to wait and see what happens to the real estate values there,” Klein said.

Klein emphasized that his committee learned it would take four to six years to get reliable real estate information – time, he said, lawmakers can’t afford to take in developing energy policies.

“There is an energy problem in this country,” Klein added. “There is an energy problem in this world, and we can’t go on business as usual and not pay attention to it.”

Proponents in the House and Senate had hoped the bill would give greater local control to town and regional planning committees in reviewing renewable energy projects.

Minority Leader Don Turner, R-Milton, said his constituents who live near Georgia Mountain still hope for a more cautious, balanced approach to ridgeline wind development.

“This week the wind turbines on the mountain didn’t turn at all,” Turner reported. “We need to understand that.”

“Georgia Mountain, which was this pristine mountain, now has a cut right up through the middle with four big turbines sticking out of it,” he said. “Some say beautiful, some don’t.”

Turner and other House lawmakers said they are confident that the bill recognizes some of the flaws in Vermont’s renewable energy policies.

Source:  By Kirk Carapezza | Vermont Public Radio | April 26, 2013 | vpr.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.