[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Fears over turbines blight on landscape 

Credit:  By Mark Mackay | The Courier | 24 April 2013 | ~~

A bid to erect Scotland’s largest wind turbines in rural Perthshire will today take its first step.

The towers would dwarf the Sidlaw hills and would be visible the length of the Carse of Gowrie and from Fife.

Objectors fear they will destroy the landscape and ecology of the Tay Estuary, blight tourism and dominate the skyline.

At 135 metres they would be considerably bigger than Dundee’s Michelin turbines, which themselves measure a mammoth 120 metres.

Green power developers Banks Renewables, however, have high hopes for the plan and will today seek permission to erect a wind measuring mast near the village of Balbeggie.

The 80 metre structure is the first step towards the creation of an eight turbine windfarm, with each tower rising 135 metres into the sky.

It will be considered by elected members at a meeting of Perth and Kinross Council’s development management committee.

During extensive meetings with community groups, managing director Colin Anderson said “well-designed windfarms in appropriate areas” had the potential to be “incredibly positive for the local economy, environment and the lives of local people”.

Objectors are, however, expected to turn out in force in a bid to persuade local councillors to block the plan from outset.

They fear that the mast – and future turbines – could devastate the landscape, damage the environment, harm local bird life and even impact on aviation.

Council planners have, however, warned that many of the objections are “premature” and have recommended that the mast plan be approved.

Source:  By Mark Mackay | The Courier | 24 April 2013 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky