[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm plans in southern Van Wert County still proceeding 

Credit:  Wind farm plans in southern VW County still proceeding | BY ED GEBERT, Times Bulletin Editor | 4/19/2013 | timesbulletin.com ~~

Tuesday’s announcement that the Van Wert County commissioners have rescinded the county-wide Alternative Energy Zone declaration is bound to have effects on the wind farm currently under development in southern Van Wert County and any expansion of the already-operating Blue Creek Wind Farm. On Thursday, the commissioners met with Roger Brown, the developer of the proposed Prairie Creek Wind Farm for BP Wind, and each side had questions about the future.

The commissioners had questions for Brown about BP’s willingness to market the wind energy division of the company. Brown admitted that BP Wind is up for sale and that the Prairie Creek project would be a part of any sale. However, he noted that the project is proceeding with plans to start construction before the end of the year and be operational in 2015.

On the other side of the coin, Brown was curious as to the commissioner’s mindset after rescinding the blanket declaration earlier this week. Commissioner Thad Lichtensteiger explained that the county wanted to have more negotiating power in matters of road agreements and the like, as well as being able to include the affected township officials and school district representatives.

The county is still able to enter into deals with wind farm developers, but deals will be either done on an individual project basis involving the Payment In Lieu Of Taxes (PILOT) option or through a regular abatement process. Lichtensteiger did admit that the commissioners are leaning toward working with the PILOT program, but that they are leaving their options open at this time.

From that point, the discussion moved to the progress of the Prairie Creek project. Brown said that the wind farm will still be a 200 megawatt (MW) project, but it could be split into two separate phases with part of the turbines going up while more field work is done for the rest of the turbine locations.

Brown also noted that the company plans to submit applications with the Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) later this summer. The complication with this project is that a separate transmission project will need to be approved since the transmission lines in the northern part of the county are already being used to the point where an alternate route to get the power to the electrical grid is needed. Both project will need OPSB approval or else the wind farm will never be a reality.

The transmission project at this point is focusing on taking the power through lines along an old rail right-of-way to Lima.

Brown indicated that the turbine model to be used has not yet been selected. He did reveal that there are two models at the top of the list of considerations – one that produces somewhere around 2.5 MW and the other around 3 MW. With the size of the Prairie Creek project fixed at 200 MW at the maximum, the selection of the turbine model will determine how many turbines would be erected.

A question over shadow flicker from turbines also incited some discussion. Commissioner Stan Owens stated that he understood the concerns and that the OPSB had indicated that any residents with an excessive amount of flicker from the shadow of the rotating blades (more than 30 hours per year) should contact the agency so that corrections can be made.

Owens went on to say that he understands complaints about shadow flicker, but that he also recognizes the right of a landowner to be a part of a project like this. He said that considering the private property rights of all parties is part of the delicate balance of keeping residents happy while promoting economic development in the county.

Source:  Wind farm plans in southern VW County still proceeding | BY ED GEBERT, Times Bulletin Editor | 4/19/2013 | timesbulletin.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky