[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Renewable subsidies for the rich  

Credit:  John McClaughry | Rutland Herald | April 18, 2013 | www.rutlandherald.com ~~

Renewable electricity costs from two to five times (depending on the technology) as much as electricity from the New England grid, generated by natural gas, hydro, coal, and nuclear. Therefore no utility would rationally buy it but for an astounding assortment of subsidies and mandates.

Consider just these: The federal investment tax credit subsidizes 30 percent of the capital costs of small-scale solar photovoltaic and wind projects. Some investors may also claim a 50 percent first-year depreciation bonus, plus five years of ordinary depreciation of the remainder, regardless of the actual lifetime of the equipment. Wind-generated electricity on any scale earns a federal production tax credit of 2.3 cents per kilowatt hour.

The Vermont Legislature has added to this cornucopia a 7.2 percent investment tax credit for small wind and solar PV electricity produced from commercial properties. The Clean Energy Development Fund, until it ran out of money, also added 45 cents per residential installed watt for solar panels (40 cents per watt for commercial and industrial projects).

The Legislature has also required Vermont utilities to buy solar PV (up to 2.2 megawatts) and small wind electricity (up to 100 kilowatts) at prices up to five times the wholesale price available on the New England power grid. In an effort to lure enough new investors to stay on target toward the 127.5 megawatt program goal, the PSB has now pushed the feed-in tariff rate for new solar PV projects up to 25.7 cents per kilowatt hour for the next 25 years; and to 26.2 cents per kilowatt-hour averaged over 20 years for small wind.

To summarize: Governments shower lucrative capital and operating subsidies on wind and solar entrepreneurs, then force the utilities to buy their electricity at up to five times the New England wholesale price for 20 to 25 years, charging the extra cost to their ratepayers. What a sweet deal!

Willem Post of Woodstock is a retired electric engineer whose career took him all over the United States and Europe. One of his hobbies is running calculations on the economics of energy, especially renewable energy.

Post describes a $10.5 million 2.2-megawatt solar PV facility in White River Junction., created by high-income Boston investors. About 15 acres of topsoil and trees were cleared, leveled, and shielded by an 8-foot-high fence. The facility almost certainly features Chinese-made solar panels and German-made inverters. It will generate electricity only when the sun is adequately shining, which is about 35 percent of the hours of the year. The expected annual generation is 2,755 megawatt-hours.

Under the legislature’s feed-in tariff law, the Public Service Board mandated that Green Mountain Power write a check to the investors each year for 25 years in the amount of $661,415. Since the cost to GMP is about four times the cost of electricity from the New England grid, the utility will charge its customers $509,840 a year more than they would otherwise have had to pay for grid power.

The generous tax benefits appeal to people in the highest income tax brackets. In 2011 the Shumlin administration made it even more attractive to the rich by allowing them to take half of the lifetime projected tax benefits from the Clean Energy Development Fund as an up-front grant, an option eagerly taken by 64 of the first 68 investors in the program.

The state’s Comprehensive Energy Plan of 2011 recommended adoption of a Vermont renewable portfolio standard, by which utilities would be required to buy increasingly higher percentages of their electricity from renewables (including Hydro-Quebec). Achieving this goal would mean that ratepayers would be hammered all the harder, while the investors pocket even greater profits. Nice.

Last spring the House was about to enact a renewable portfolio standard. At the last minute Shumlin, an erstwhile advocate, instructed the House not to do it. We don’t know why he suddenly got cold feet, but 14 of the 29 states with RPS laws are currently watering them down.

That suggests that a lot of voters forced to pay for the renewable mandates have discovered that they are a very bad deal – unless they have allowed people like Peter Shumlin and Bill McKibben to terrify them about the Menace of Global Warming, which has disappeared since 1999.

John McClaughry is vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute (www.ethanallen.org).

Source:  John McClaughry | Rutland Herald | April 18, 2013 | www.rutlandherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.